武漢晨報(bào) 2009-12-10 速覽世界 35
哥本哈根驚曝“西方密約”
據(jù)《中國(guó)日?qǐng)?bào)》報(bào)道 正在丹麥?zhǔn)锥几绫竟e行的聯(lián)合國(guó)氣候峰會(huì)9日陷入困擾,原因是英國(guó)《衛(wèi)報(bào)》披露了一份決議草案,該草案不僅賦予了發(fā)達(dá)工業(yè)國(guó)家在未來(lái)氣候變化問(wèn)題談判上更大的話語(yǔ)權(quán),而且還削弱了聯(lián)合國(guó)在此問(wèn)題上的應(yīng)有作用,拋棄了《京都議定書(shū)》的減排原則。該草案因此引起了發(fā)展中國(guó)家的強(qiáng)烈不滿與抵制。
根據(jù)英國(guó)《衛(wèi)報(bào)》的報(bào)道,這份名為“丹麥提案”(Danish Text)的決議草案實(shí)際上是一份“西方密約”,因?yàn)樗怯砂ㄓ?guó)、美國(guó)和丹麥在內(nèi)的幾個(gè)西方工業(yè)發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家共同起草的。
該草案背棄了《京都議定書(shū)》規(guī)定的由發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家?guī)ь^減排、發(fā)展中國(guó)家毋須強(qiáng)制減排的精神,即“共同但有區(qū)別”的原則。根據(jù)該草案設(shè)定的人均排放標(biāo)準(zhǔn),發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家可以比發(fā)展中國(guó)家多排放一倍的溫室氣體,即從現(xiàn)在起到2050年,發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家可人均累積排放2.67噸溫室氣體,而發(fā)展中國(guó)家人均只可累積排放1.44噸。
此外,該草案還將應(yīng)付氣候變化的融資撥款大權(quán)交給了西方國(guó)家主導(dǎo)的世界銀行。這樣一來(lái),發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家便擁有了一項(xiàng)特殊權(quán)利——可以根據(jù)發(fā)展中國(guó)家的“實(shí)際表現(xiàn)”來(lái)決定是否向其提供資金援助。
報(bào)道還說(shuō),為了實(shí)現(xiàn)它們的“如意算盤(pán)”,發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家還決定通過(guò)扶持一些所謂的“最脆弱國(guó)家”來(lái)進(jìn)一步分化與瓦解發(fā)展中國(guó)家。
由于這份決議草案明顯是在“劫貧濟(jì)富”,草案的內(nèi)容一經(jīng)公布立即引發(fā)了強(qiáng)烈的不滿。
在進(jìn)行了閉門(mén)磋商以后,七十七國(guó)集團(tuán)輪值主席、蘇丹常駐聯(lián)合國(guó)副代表迪亞平8日19點(diǎn)(北京時(shí)間9日凌晨2點(diǎn))召開(kāi)新聞發(fā)布會(huì),表示堅(jiān)決反對(duì)該草案中的內(nèi)容。“我們不能承受談判破裂的危險(xiǎn),但是,我們不會(huì)簽署不平等的協(xié)議,我們也不能讓世界上80%的人口繼續(xù)承受苦難與不公正待遇。”
在被問(wèn)及此事時(shí),中國(guó)代表團(tuán)副團(tuán)長(zhǎng)、發(fā)改委氣候司司長(zhǎng)蘇偉表示,中國(guó)還沒(méi)有看到這份草案因此無(wú)法表態(tài),但是中國(guó)絕不接受對(duì)發(fā)展中國(guó)家不利的決議。
鏈接 中國(guó)碳排放峰值年份:2030~2040
科技部部長(zhǎng)萬(wàn)鋼7日表示,中國(guó)溫室氣體排放將在2030年至2040年間達(dá)到頂峰,他希望中國(guó)能在此時(shí)間范圍內(nèi)盡可能早地達(dá)到峰值。這也是中國(guó)部長(zhǎng)級(jí)官員首次公開(kāi)預(yù)估中國(guó)碳排放的峰值年份。丹麥此前提出的一份大會(huì)草案要將全球排放峰值年定為2025年,遭到以中國(guó)、印度為首的發(fā)展中國(guó)家強(qiáng)烈反對(duì)。
Copenhagen climate summit in disarray after 'Danish text' leak
Developing countries react furiously to leaked draft agreement that would hand more power to rich nations, sideline the UN's negotiating role and abandon the Kyoto protocol
• Read the 'Danish text'
• In pictures: Copenhagen day two
- guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 8 December 2009 14.09 GMT
A Haitian delegation rests before the second-day session begins in Copenhagen. Photograph: Attila Kisbenedek/AFP/Getty Images
The UN Copenhagen climate talks are in disarray today after developing countries reacted furiously to leaked documents that show world leaders will next week be asked to sign an agreement that hands more power to rich countries and sidelines the UN's role in all future climate change negotiations.
The document is also being interpreted by developing countries as setting unequal limits on per capita carbon emissions for developed and developing countries in 2050; meaning that people in rich countries would be permitted to emit nearly twice as much under the proposals.
The so-called Danish text, a secret draft agreement worked on by a group of individuals known as "the circle of commitment" – but understood to include the UK, US and Denmark – has only been shown to a handful of countries since it was finalised this week.
The agreement, leaked to the Guardian, is a departure from the Kyoto protocol's principle that rich nations, which have emitted the bulk of the CO2, should take on firm and binding commitments to reduce greenhouse gases, while poorer nations were not compelled to act. The draft hands effective control of climate change finance to the World Bank; would abandon the Kyoto protocol – the only legally binding treaty that the world has on emissions reductions; and would make any money to help poor countries adapt to climate change dependent on them taking a range of actions.
The document was described last night by one senior diplomat as "a very dangerous document for developing countries. It is a fundamental reworking of the UN balance of obligations. It is to be superimposed without discussion on the talks".
A confidential analysis of the text by developing countries also seen by the Guardian shows deep unease over details of the text. In particular, it is understood to:
• Force developing countries to agree to specific emission cuts and measures that were not part of the original UN agreement;
• Divide poor countries further by creating a new category of developing countries called "the most vulnerable";
• Weaken the UN's role in handling climate finance;
• Not allow poor countries to emit more than 1.44 tonnes of carbon per person by 2050, while allowing rich countries to emit 2.67 tonnes.
Developing countries that have seen the text are understood to be furious that it is being promoted by rich countries without their knowledge and without discussion in the negotiations.
"It is being done in secret. Clearly the intention is to get [Barack] Obama and the leaders of other rich countries to muscle it through when they arrive next week. It effectively is the end of the UN process," said one diplomat, who asked to remain nameless.
Antonio Hill, climate policy adviser for Oxfam International, said: "This is only a draft but it highlights the risk that when the big countries come together, the small ones get hurting. On every count the emission cuts need to be scaled up. It allows too many loopholes and does not suggest anything like the 40% cuts that science is saying is needed."
Hill continued: "It proposes a green fund to be run by a board but the big risk is that it will run by the World Bank and the Global Environment Facility [a partnership of 10 agencies including the World Bank and the UN Environment Programme] and not the UN. That would be a step backwards, and it tries to put constraints on developing countries when none were negotiated in earlier UN climate talks."
The text was intended by Denmark and rich countries to be a working framework, which would be adapted by countries over the next week. It is particularly inflammatory because it sidelines the UN negotiating process and suggests that rich countries are desperate for world leaders to have a text to work from when they arrive next week.
Few numbers or figures are included in the text because these would be filled in later by world leaders. However, it seeks to hold temperature rises to 2C and mentions the sum of $10bn a year to help poor countries adapt to climate change from 2012-15.
相關(guān)文章
- 馬也:第三世界的聲音,終審判決--從里約到德班(4-5)
- 郎咸平:氣候問(wèn)題大騙局---歐盟征收碳排放稅的荒誕理由
- 德班世界氣候大會(huì):資本主義富國(guó)判貧困國(guó)家人民氣候死刑!
- 福斯特:《京都議定書(shū)》的失敗
- 丁一凡:要防止低碳成為新的金融投機(jī)的借口
- 氣候政策和行動(dòng):中國(guó)和美國(guó)的比較
- 南美召開(kāi)“世界人民氣候大會(huì)”受關(guān)注
- 從里約走來(lái)--哥本哈根思考之一
- 西南赤地千里,華北沙暴肆虐--亟需計(jì)劃經(jīng)濟(jì)應(yīng)對(duì)氣候變化與環(huán)境危機(jī)
- 王中宇:哥本哈根:鬧劇后的沉思
- 哥本哈根會(huì)議檢討
- 劉仰:哥本哈根之后中國(guó)的“低碳危局”
「 支持烏有之鄉(xiāng)!」
您的打賞將用于網(wǎng)站日常運(yùn)行與維護(hù)。
幫助我們辦好網(wǎng)站,宣傳紅色文化!