国产免费人成视频在线观看,国产极品粉嫩馒头一线天AV,国产精品欧美一区二区三区,亚洲 古典 另类 欧美 在线

首頁(yè) > 文章 > 經(jīng)濟(jì) > 經(jīng)濟(jì)視點(diǎn)

烏有編譯:奧巴馬簽署《孟山都保護(hù)法》 該法案系孟山都撰寫(xiě)

秋實(shí)編譯 · 2013-03-31 · 來(lái)源:今日俄羅斯等
收藏( 評(píng)論() 字體: / /

  據(jù)報(bào)道,盡管有25萬(wàn)人聯(lián)署反對(duì),奧巴馬上周二還是簽署了這一埋藏在78頁(yè)法律中的《孟山都保護(hù)法》。該法案有利于孟山都等轉(zhuǎn)基因公司向民眾兜售轉(zhuǎn)基因作物,即使出現(xiàn)對(duì)人身體有害或者造成環(huán)境污染的情況下,也能避免聯(lián)邦法院的制裁。許多食品安全的倡導(dǎo)者認(rèn)為現(xiàn)在還沒(méi)有對(duì)轉(zhuǎn)基因種子和作物的潛在危害做足夠的研究,若潛在危害顯露時(shí),法律是阻止轉(zhuǎn)基因公司兜售和種植轉(zhuǎn)基因作物的關(guān)鍵手段。然而《孟山都保護(hù)法案》的簽署使得民眾無(wú)法再用法律手段來(lái)維護(hù)自己的權(quán)利。

       據(jù)IB Times 揭露,這個(gè)法案由孟山都支持的共和黨議員Roy Blunt提出,由Blunt與孟山都共同撰寫(xiě).

       另?yè)?jù)華盛頓時(shí)報(bào)指出,這個(gè)法案的通過(guò)被許多像先正達(dá)公司、美國(guó)嘉吉公司和孟山都視為勝利,這些公司自2009年以來(lái)就向國(guó)會(huì)捐助750萬(wàn)美元,以及向參議院撥款委員會(huì)捐助37.2萬(wàn)美元。(據(jù)今日俄羅斯,IB Times 等)

  Furor Growing Against Obama Over 'Monsanto Protection Act'

  原文鏈接:http://www.ibtimes.com/furor-growing-against-obama-over-monsanto-protection-act-1156459#

  Anger is growing against President Barack Obama the day after he signed into law a spending bill that included a provision opponents have dubbed the "Monsanto Protection Act."

  food and public safety advocates and independent farmers are furious that Obama signed it despite its inclusion of language that they consider to be a gift to Monsanto Company (NYSE:MON) and other firms that produce genetically modified organisms (GMOs) or genetically engineered (GE) seeds and crops.

  And protesters have spent the past couple of days demonstrating in front of the White House, first calling on Obama to veto the bill, and now criticizing him for his failure to do so.

  The protests come on the heels of a massive petition campaign organized by the advocacy group Food Democracy Now, which gathered the signatures of more than 200,000 people who wanted Obama to veto HR 933 in order to stop Section 735 -- the so-called "Monsanto Protection Act" -- from being codified into law.

  But Obama ignored it, instead choosing to sign a bill that effectively bars federal courts from being able to halt the sale or planting of GMO or GE crops and seeds, no matter what health consequences from the consumption of these products may come to light in the future.

  "This provision is simply an industry ploy to continue to sell genetically engineered seeds even when a court of law has found they were approved by USDA illegally," the petition stated. "It is unnecessary and an unprecedented attack on U.S. judicial review. Congress should not be meddling with the judicial review process based solely on the special interest of a handful of companies."

  Many food safety advocates maintain that there have not been enough studies into the potential health risks of GMO and GE seeds and crops, and the judicial power to stop companies from selling or planting them was one key recourse they were relying on to stop them from being sold if health risks come to light.

  But the "Monsanto Protection Act" -- referred to as the "Farmer Assurance Provision" by its supporters -- removes that course of action, and those who are angry at Obama for signing the bill are also incensed with Sen. Barbara Mikulski, D- Md., who is accused of failing to give the amendment that inserted the language a proper hearing.

  附文:

  Monsanto Wrote Monsanto Protection Act

  原文鏈接:http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/448-farm-and-food-policy/16689-focus-monsanto-wrote-monsanto-protection-act 

  'Monsanto Protection Act' slips silently through US Congress

  http://rt.com/usa/monsanto-congress-silently-slips-830/

  So, just how much of a victory is this for biotech companies like Monsanto? Critics are thus far alarmed by the very way in which the provision made it through Congress -- the rider was introduced anonymously as the larger bill progressed through the Senate Appropriations Committee. Now, groups like the Center for Food Safety are holding Senator Mikulski (D-MD), chairman of that committee, to task and lobbing accusations of a “backroom deal” with the biotech industry.

  As the Washington Times points out, the provision’s success is viewed by many as a victory by companies like Syngenta Corp, Cargill, Monsanto and affiliated PACs that have donated $7.5 million to members of Congress since 2009, and $372,000 to members of the Senate Appropriations Committee.

「 支持烏有之鄉(xiāng)!」

烏有之鄉(xiāng) WYZXWK.COM

您的打賞將用于網(wǎng)站日常運(yùn)行與維護(hù)。
幫助我們辦好網(wǎng)站,宣傳紅色文化!

注:配圖來(lái)自網(wǎng)絡(luò)無(wú)版權(quán)標(biāo)志圖像,侵刪!
聲明:文章僅代表作者個(gè)人觀點(diǎn),不代表本站觀點(diǎn)——烏有之鄉(xiāng) 責(zé)任編輯:紅土地

歡迎掃描下方二維碼,訂閱烏有之鄉(xiāng)網(wǎng)刊微信公眾號(hào)

收藏

心情表態(tài)

今日頭條

最新專(zhuān)題

毛主席誕辰130周年

點(diǎn)擊排行

  • 兩日熱點(diǎn)
  • 一周熱點(diǎn)
  • 一月熱點(diǎn)
  • 心情
  1. 司馬南|會(huì)飛的螞蟻終于被剪了翅膀
  2. 美國(guó)的這次出招,后果很?chē)?yán)重
  3. 褻瀆中華民族歷史,易某天新書(shū)下架!
  4. 我對(duì)胡錫進(jìn)和司馬南兩個(gè)網(wǎng)絡(luò)大V的不同看法
  5. 司馬南|對(duì)照著中華人民共和國(guó)憲法,大家給評(píng)評(píng)理吧!
  6. 菲律賓沖撞中國(guó)海警船,中國(guó)會(huì)打嗎?
  7. 否定了錯(cuò)誤,并不代表問(wèn)題不存在了
  8. 2001年就貪污23億后出逃,如今被抓回國(guó)內(nèi),也叫認(rèn)罪悔罪減刑?
  9. 公開(kāi)投毒!多個(gè)重大事變的真相!
  10. 張志坤|“先富”起來(lái)的那些人將向何處去
  1. 普京剛走,沙特王子便墜機(jī)身亡
  2. 送完一萬(wàn)億,再送一萬(wàn)億?
  3. 湖北石鋒:奇了怪了,貪污腐敗、貧富差距、分配不公竟成了好事!
  4. 紫虬:從通鋼、聯(lián)想到華為,平等的顛覆與柳暗花明
  5. 李昌平:縣鄉(xiāng)村最大的問(wèn)題是:官越來(lái)越多,員越來(lái)越少!
  6. 朝鮮領(lǐng)導(dǎo)落淚
  7. 讀衛(wèi)茂華文章:“聯(lián)想柳傳志事件”大討論沒(méi)有結(jié)果,不能劃句號(hào)
  8. 司馬南|南京市政府通告里面沒(méi)講的內(nèi)容
  9. 司馬南|會(huì)飛的螞蟻終于被剪了翅膀
  10. 房地產(chǎn)崩盤(pán),對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)的影響超出你的想象
  1. 張勤德:堅(jiān)決打好清算胡錫進(jìn)們的反毛言行這一仗
  2. 郝貴生|如何科學(xué)認(rèn)識(shí)毛主席的晚年實(shí)踐活動(dòng)? ——紀(jì)念毛主席誕辰130周年
  3. 吳銘|這件事,我理解不了
  4. 今天,我們?cè)庥鲋旅粨簦?/a>
  5. 尹國(guó)明:胡錫進(jìn)先生,我知道這次你很急
  6. 不搞清官貪官,搞文化大革命
  7. 三大神藥謊言被全面揭穿!“吸血鬼”病毒出現(xiàn)!面對(duì)發(fā)燒我們?cè)趺崔k?
  8. 祁建平:拿出理論勇氣來(lái)一次撥亂反正
  9. 說(shuō)“胡漢三回來(lái)了”,為什么有人卻急眼了?
  10. 這輪房?jī)r(jià)下跌的影響,也許遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)超過(guò)你的想象
  1. 77年前,2583名英雄兒女踏上北撤之路
  2. 大蒜威脅國(guó)家安全不重要,重點(diǎn)是他為什么會(huì)那樣說(shuō)
  3. 相約12月26日,共赴韶山!
  4. 烏有之鄉(xiāng)關(guān)于推出紙質(zhì)閱讀資料的公告
  5. 歐洲金靴|“一切標(biāo)準(zhǔn)向毛主席看齊!” | 欣聞柯慶施落像上海福壽園
  6. 送完一萬(wàn)億,再送一萬(wàn)億?