方舟子的要害在哪里？

-----------------

作者: 它山之石轉(zhuǎn)載(常.國.紫.帆) [172032:12011], 17:18:35 09/30/2010:
- 論劍談棋 豪杰盡聚 - 華岳論壇 - http://www.hua-yue.net/

送交者: forest 于 2010-10-01 04:14:22

身份疑惑。方舟子現(xiàn)在究竟是什么身份？中國國籍？美國國籍?美國綠卡？我印象中他曾經(jīng)自己說過，因?yàn)橛幸淮稳ヮI(lǐng)事館辦護(hù)照延期手續(xù)，開了6-7個(gè)小時(shí)車到了，結(jié)果離下班時(shí)間只剩5分鐘，領(lǐng)事館沒有受理，讓他再來一趟。方舟子一怒之下加入了美國國籍。好像還在新語絲網(wǎng)上討論過入美國籍需要宣誓的問題，由此引起了對(duì)錢學(xué)森的質(zhì)疑。所以我很懷疑他現(xiàn)在是美國公民。

如果是美國國籍，他現(xiàn)在中國自由打假，四處活動(dòng)，有沒有這種權(quán)利？有沒有去過禁止外國人去的軍事管轄區(qū)？有沒有到相關(guān)機(jī)關(guān)辦理過外國人居留手續(xù)？他目前住在新華社宿舍區(qū)，有沒有泄露國家機(jī)密的可能？

如果是美國綠卡。那么他有沒有定期回美國？有沒有正式雇傭單位？有沒有合法納稅？

如果是中國籍。那么他的新雨絲網(wǎng)站有沒有正式在中國主管部門登記?有沒有新聞出版署的執(zhí)照？算不算私人非法結(jié)社？他的基金會(huì)有沒有非法集資的嫌疑？

新語絲是在美國注冊(cè)的，既然是外媒，那么他們的采訪是否經(jīng)過審批？

肖06年在美起訴他們時(shí),方是美國公民,link見內(nèi)
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_490f7660010005ot.html

美國之音，CNN都可以自由采訪國內(nèi)的人民和媒體？

方舟子在美被起訴之英文文書
NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

------------------------------------------------------X

CHUAN-GUO XIAO, Index No.

Plaintiff,

- against - COMPLAINT

YI RAO, SHIMIN FANG and

NEW THREADS CHINESE CULTURAL SOCIETY, INC.

Defendants.

-----------------------------------------------------X

Nature of the Action
1. Plaintiff, Chuan-Guo Xiao, brings this action for defamation to redress false written statements maliciously made and published by defendants. Plaintiff, a resident of Brooklyn is defamed in the article “My Opinions On The Libel Suit Brought by Xiao Chuan-Guo Against Fang Shi-Min,” (henceforth “My Opinions”) written by defendant YI RAO and published on the internet by defendants SHIMIN FANG and NEW THREADS CHINESE CULTURAL SOCIETY, INC., and thereafter and as a result published by the print and internet editions of the People’s Daily, a leading Chinese-language news source. The article is a sustained and malicious assault upon plaintiff’s reputation, falsely and with malice claiming plaintiff has a “very low level of academic achievement” and has failed to demonstrate that “he really knows science at all,” plus other similar statements. The article goes on to state, falsely and with malice, that Plaintiff is either mentally retarded or a “psychopath.” The author claims himself qualified to make such judgments, since he is “very familiar with the Chinese biomedical community,” has “in depth knowledge about biomedical history and evolution in China,” is “well connected within international neuroscience circle.”

2. The truth is that Chun-Guo Xiao is a highly-regarded academic urologist who is internationally recognized for his pioneering work related to bladder problems related to spinal cord injury, and has pioneered a novel procedure for the rehabilitation of such spinal-cord related bladder dysfunction. This novel procedure has enabled victims of such injury to void without the aid of a catheter, thereby avoiding the serious risks of infection associated with constant catheter use and thereby increasing life expectancy.

3. Upon information and belief, defendants Yi Rao, Shimin Fang and New Threads Chinese Cultural Society, Inc. knew all of the true facts set forth in paragraph 2 above, yet they published the defamation knowing it was untrue and without regard to its effect on plaintiff.

4. As a result of these knowingly false assertions, plaintiff has suffered injury to his personal and professional reputation, great emotional and psychological distress, loss of business and career opportunities, and specifically was denied an appointment to the Chinese Academy of Science. All defendants are therefore jointly and severally liable for compensatory and exemplary damages.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE
5. This Court has diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(2) in that Plaintiff is a citizen of China domiciled in China, who resides in the State of New York as a lawful alien; defendant Yi Rao is a United States Citizen domiciled in the State of Illinois; defendant Shimin Fang is a United States Citizen domiciled in the State of California; and defendant New Threads Chinese Cultural Society, Inc. is a New York State corporation with its principal place of business in New York State. The matter in controversy exceeds, exclusive of interests and costs, the sum specified by 28 U.S.C. § 1332.

6. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(a) because a substantial amount of the events giving rise to the claim occurred in the Southern District of New York.

THE PARTIES
Chun-Guo Xiao

7. Plaintiff, Chun-Guo Xiao, is a Clinical Associate Professor on the faculty of New York University School of Medicine. He is a citizen of China, maintains his domicile in China, and is an alien lawfully in this country, residing in Brooklyn, County of Kings, State of New York..

8. Throughout his career of public service and private practice, plaintiff has always developed an excellent reputation for academic, scientific and medical achievement in his profession. Doctor Xiao is the only person in the history of the American Urological Association to be the recipient of the distinguished Jack Lapides award on two separate occasions. This award is one given by the American Urological Association for outstanding work in the field of Urology.

9. Plaintiff's academic career, as well as his private medical practice depend on his reputation for academic, scientific, and medical achievement.

Yi Rao

10. Defendant Yi Rao is a professor of neurology at the North Western University School of Medicine, in Illinois

11. Upon information and belief, defendant Yi Rao is the author of “My Opinions.”

12. Defendant Yi Rao is a resident of Chicago, Illinois. He is a citizen of the United States.

New Threads Chinese Cultural Society, Inc.

13. Upon information and belief, defendant New Threads Chinese Cultural Society, Inc., is a New York not-for-profit corporation, incorporated in Onandanga County, New York, and with its principal place of business in Liverpool, Onandanga County, New York. One of its primary business operations is the publication of New Threads magazine, a daily internet magazine. The defendant corporation and the magazine are operated by defendant Shimin Fang, who is also its President and Director of the defendant corporation. The defendant corporation is known for sensationalist journalism, particularly muckraking articles assaulting the reputations of prominent Chinese citizens.

14. Defendant New Threads Chinese Cultural Society, Inc. published an online edition of the article “My Opinions” on or about September 6, 2006, and has continued to publish the article online thereafter.

Shimin Fang

15. Defendant Shimin Fang is the President and Director of defendant New Threads Chinese Cultural Society, Inc. On prior occasions, not directly the subject of this lawsuit, defendant Shimin Fang wrote libelous claims about plaintiff, which he and New Threads Chinese Cultural Society, Inc. arranged to have published in the New Threads internet magazine. After plaintiff successfully sued Shimin Fang for libel for these statements, Shimin Fang, in retaliation and with malicious motives, arranged for the libelous article “My Opinion,” ostensibly written by Yi Rao, to be published by New Threads Chinese Cultural Society, Inc. and elsewhere.

16. Shimin Fang is a resident of the City of San Diego, County of San Diego, State of California. He is a citizen of the United States.

The Untrue Statements in “My Opinions”Concerning Chun-Guo Xiao
17. Defendant Yi Rao’s article, “My Opinion,” consists of a sustained assault upon plaintiff’s reputation, wherein defendant Yi Rao claims plaintiff has a “very low level of academic achievement” and has failed to demonstrate that “he really knows science at all” or is any better than “the students taught by my students,” and that “[i]f he ever becomes an academician, he will surely set the record for the lowest standing.” The article goes on to express defendant Yi Roa’s belief that Plaintiff must be mentally defective.

18. Although Yi Roa, in his article, continually and in an exaggerated tongue-in-cheek fashion, characterizes his defamatory statements as “opinions,” this is little more than a legalistic ploy, and evidently intended to be understood as such by the readers. The beginning of the article, Yi Roa strains to characterize himself as a person with connections and expertise within the international neuroscience community and the Chinese biomedical community, so as to establish that he is qualified to assess the academic reputation of Plaintiff, Chun-Guo Xiao.

19. An English Translation of “My Opinion” is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference.

20. The article “My Opinion,” in Chinese, continues to be disseminated widely throughout the United States and in other countries via the internet.

Defamation and Damages
21. The statements referred to in paragraph 15 above, published by defendants of and concerning plaintiff, are materially false and defamatory and impute to plaintiff general professional and academic incompetence, total lack of fitness for his profession, and even mental illness. Defendants published these statements wantonly and recklessly, with reckless disregard for its injurious effect upon plaintiff.

22. By reason of the above, plaintiff has suffered emotional anguish, and been injured in his character and reputation in the community, particularly in the Chinese-reading community, both professionally and otherwise, to his damage in the sum of (i) $500,000 in compensatory damages and (ii) $500,000 in exemplary damages in an amount that is a sufficient percentage of defendants' net worth to deter such conduct in the future.

First Cause of Action(Libel—Gross Irresponsibility as Against All Defendants)

23. Plaintiff hereby repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 22 as if fully set forth herein.

24. In publishing the defamatory statements referred to in paragraph 15, defendants acted in a grossly irresponsible manner without due consideration for the standards of information gathering and dissemination ordinarily followed by responsible parties.

Second Cause of Action(Libel—Actual Malice as Against All Defendants)

25. Plaintiff hereby repeats and realleges paragraph 1 through 22 as if fully set forth herein.

26. At the time the defendants published the defamatory statements quoted in paragraph 15, they knew that they were false, or acted with reckless disregard of whether they were true or not.

WHEREFORE, plaintiff, Chun-Guo Xiao:

1. demands judgment against all defendants in an amount not less than $500,000, together with interest and the costs and disbursements of this action, reasonable attorneys' fees, and punitive damages in an amount not less than $500,000 or in an amount that is sufficient as a percentage of defendants' net worth to deter such conduct in the futures; and

2. requests such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and proper.

Dated: New York, New York

October ___, 2006

______________________________

James B. LeBow

Attorney for Plaintiff

350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 4710

New York, New York

(212) 868-3311

文章引用自：http://community.highai.com/blogs/jeanjark/archive/2006/11.aspx

*** 回應(yīng)主帖
*** 返回論壇

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

跟帖目錄:

方在1993年拿綠卡，現(xiàn)在應(yīng)該是美國公民 - 末允 17:21:53 09/30/2010
另外，你轉(zhuǎn)的法律文件也明確顯示方是民是美國公民 - 末允 17:33:03 09/30/2010

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

原 帖 [ 0 ]

方在1993年拿綠卡，現(xiàn)在應(yīng)該是美國公民
五年以上，現(xiàn)沒有正經(jīng)工作，半年以上時(shí)間在美國以外的北京，基本上是一種美國公民的行為。
[ 1:84 ] 末允(秦.縣.甘.莓) - 17:21:53 09/30/2010 *** 回 帖

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
原 帖 [ 1 ]
另外，你轉(zhuǎn)的法律文件也明確顯示方是民是美國公民
16. Shimin Fang is a resident of the City of San Diego, County of San Diego, State of California. He is a citizen of the United States.

[ 2:151 ] 末允(秦.縣.甘.莓) - 17:33:03 09/30/2010 *** 回 帖

附文1：

方舟子是誰？
黎陽
2010．9．3．

華岳論壇

中國主流媒體非常津津樂道方舟子，使他名氣很大，而且越來越大。然而奇怪的是那么熱衷于報(bào)道方舟子的主流媒體卻從不熱衷于報(bào)道方舟子的真實(shí)身份，更對(duì)他的職業(yè)和收入三箴其口。

如果方舟子沒有拼命推廣轉(zhuǎn)基因主糧，我對(duì)他的真正身份也沒多大興趣。然而很奇怪，一貫以疾惡如仇不容造假形象出現(xiàn)的方舟子偏偏在涉及中華民族生死存亡的轉(zhuǎn)基因主糧安全性造假問題上一反常態(tài)，不但沒有半點(diǎn)勢(shì)不兩立你死我活的打假勁頭，反而滿腔熱情地為已經(jīng)證明有害的轉(zhuǎn)基因技術(shù)百般辯護(hù)，這就令我不得不問個(gè)為什么，想知道這個(gè)方舟子究竟是誰，干什么的，靠什么為生，跟美國孟山都轉(zhuǎn)基因公司有沒有利益關(guān)系。于是我從網(wǎng)絡(luò)上搜索了一下有關(guān)方舟子這方面的信息，結(jié)果如下（見附錄）。 

如果方舟子真的擁有“美國永久居住證，并稱其長期在美國居住”，那根據(jù)美國法律，他要保持美國永久居民（綠卡）身份，就必須每年在美國住滿6個(gè)月以上，除非他是美國在華公司的正式雇員，工作場地就在中國。

然而根據(jù)報(bào)道，方舟子在中國沒有工作，是靠“給國內(nèi)一些媒體寫文章”謀生的。如果真是這樣，那他將無法保持自己的美國綠卡身份。

如果方舟子靠“給國內(nèi)一些媒體寫文章”就能獲得足夠的收入，在北京買房買車（“開的是普通的豐田車，住的是二居室”），那我倒很想知道方舟子的有酬勞的文章都有哪些，發(fā)表在哪些媒體上——既然是公開發(fā)表的，那就用不著保密，可以一一統(tǒng)計(jì)出來，證明收入足以維持其生活，以便向人們證實(shí)一點(diǎn)：他的打假文章跟他那些用以謀生的有償支付的文章毫不相干。 

如果方舟子不能證明自己是美國在華公司的正式雇員，那么他必須每年至少有6個(gè)月住到美國，他的護(hù)照上應(yīng)該有相應(yīng)的出入境記錄。如果他不能出示他的這些出入境記錄，又不肯承認(rèn)他在中國受雇于美國公司，那只能證明他的雇主不能公開，也就是說，他有秘密的、見不得人的雇主，這才是他真正的經(jīng)濟(jì)來源。 

方舟子既然做出一副光明磊落、疾惡如仇、眼睛里容不得沙子、跟一切造假勢(shì)不兩立的樣子，既然跑到中國到處指手畫腳，那就應(yīng)該讓中國人知道他究竟是誰：中國人？美國人？美國綠卡？那就應(yīng)該把自己的真實(shí)身份、真實(shí)職業(yè)、真實(shí)收入來源如實(shí)告訴中國人，不造半點(diǎn)假，否則豈能讓人不懷疑他有特殊身份、特殊使命、只打小假、掩護(hù)大假、表面為民除害，實(shí)際卻為滅絕中華民族的轉(zhuǎn)基因武器服務(wù)效勞？ 

=======================================
黎陽聲明：本人放棄對(duì)此文的版權(quán)。只要不違背本文主旨，任何人均可轉(zhuǎn)貼，可散發(fā)，可抄襲，可復(fù)制，可被冒名頂替，可被任何媒體拿去用，可被任何人引用到任何文章中且不寫出引文出處，本人分文不取。

× 烏有之鄉(xiāng) WYZXWK.COM

您的打賞將用于網(wǎng)站日常運(yùn)行與維護(hù)。
幫助我們辦好網(wǎng)站，宣傳紅色文化！

歡迎掃描下方二維碼，訂閱烏有之鄉(xiāng)網(wǎng)刊微信公眾號(hào)