国产免费人成视频在线观看,国产极品粉嫩馒头一线天AV,国产精品欧美一区二区三区,亚洲 古典 另类 欧美 在线

首頁 > 文章 > 爭鳴 > 網友時評

圣刊“Nature”報道“著名生物化學家”方是民被打案

北大老教授 · 2010-09-30 · 來源:烏有之鄉
方舟子評析 收藏( 評論() 字體: / /

僅發一篇至今數據被質疑的論文就成為著名生物化學家的方舟子-方是民因被打又上今天出版的圣刊Nature了,而且還有他的標準像,多給他的祖國-美國增彩啊!Nature新聞附后供網友拜讀:  

   

Published online 29 September 2010 | Nature 467, 511 (2010) | doi:10.1038/ 467511a    

News  

Brawl in   Beijing    

Critics of Chinese researchers targeted in physical attacks.  

David Cyranoski   

                                      Former biochemist Fang Shimin has made enemies after scrutinizing scientists’ reputations.FANG SHIMIN  

Science can be a rough game in   China  . On 29 August, on his way home from a tea house in   Beijing  , Fang Shimin was assaulted. The former biochemist — who for the past decade has run a website exposing scientific fraudsters — was chased by two men, caught and attacked with a hammer.  

"I believe they planned to kill me," he says. "The only way to shut me up is to kill me." He escaped with only minor cuts and bruises. In June, Fang Xuanchang, a journalist who had reported on corruption in science in   China  , was left with more serious injuries after two men assaulted him with steel rods.  

On 21 September, police arrested Xiao Chuanguo, a urologist at  Tongji   Medical   College  in   Wuhan  , on suspicion of master­minding both plots. Xiao could not be reached for comment, but has confessed his involvement to   Beijing  's police. Fang Shimin says Xiao could face 3–10 years in prison — or more if the charges become attempted murder.  

Xiao and Fang Shimin have never met or spoken, but their paths have crossed on the Internet — and in court. Xiao's clash with him, and with Fang Xuanchang, revolves around a surgical procedure devised by Xiao that aims to restore bladder and bowel function in patients with spina bifida or spinal-cord injuries. Xiao reported an impressive 87% success rate for the operation, which involves re-routing nerves1,2. In 2005, he was nominated for membership of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the elite body of the Chinese scientific world.  

Following his nomination, people started posting questions about Xiao's claims on Fang Shimin's website (http://fangzhouzi-xys.blogspot.com). Then in September 2005, Fang Shimin published an essay in Beijing Sci–Tech Report, which said that Xiao was not an associate professor at   New York   University   as he states in his CV, but only an assistant professor. Furthermore, the article said that only 4 of the 26 English-language publications Xiao listed were journal articles — the rest being abstracts from conference proceedings.  

It is not known if Fang Shimin's article affected the academy's decision, but Xiao was not made a member and has since sued Fang Shimin for libel five times. Fang Shimin, whose site has been criticized for giving contributors a platform for unjustified attacks on their enemies3, lost one case and won two, with the other two undecided. Meanwhile, criticism of the 'Xiao procedure' has continued. Last year, Fang Xuanchang published a series of articles questioning its efficacy, which may have prompted the attacks on him.   

ADVERTISEMENT  

             

Beijing-based lawyer Peng Jian says he has interviewed 20–30 patients who have experienced side effects after undergoing the Xiao procedure, and who are seeking compensation. This summer, the first   US   trial of the treatment reported ambiguous results in The Journal of Urology4, and two journal editorials said it should be considered experimental4.   

Fang Shimin, meanwhile, is unfazed by the attack. "It won't stop me," he says. "I will continue to do what I am doing."   

·                                 References  

1.                                                     Xiao, C.-G. Proc. Int. Conf. Urol. Shanghai, 2–4 July (2005).   

2.                                                     Xiao, C.-G. Eur. Urol. 49, 22-29 (2006).   

3.                                                     Cyranoski, D. Nature 441, 392-393 (2006).   

4.                                                     Peters, K. M. et al. J. Urol. 184, 702-708 (2010).   

「 支持烏有之鄉!」

烏有之鄉 WYZXWK.COM

您的打賞將用于網站日常運行與維護。
幫助我們辦好網站,宣傳紅色文化!

注:配圖來自網絡無版權標志圖像,侵刪!
聲明:文章僅代表作者個人觀點,不代表本站觀點——烏有之鄉 責任編輯:heji

歡迎掃描下方二維碼,訂閱烏有之鄉網刊微信公眾號

收藏

心情表態

今日頭條

點擊排行

  • 兩日熱點
  • 一周熱點
  • 一月熱點
  • 心情
  1. 反抗吧,我的人民,反抗吧
  2. 毛主席,為什么反不得?
  3. 為什么總有人把毛主席放在后四十年的對立面?
  4. 劉繼明|隨想錄(20)
  5. 吃飽了才會有道德嗎?
  6. 美化軍閥是嚴重錯誤,整改批判應一視同仁
  7. 孫錫良 | 圓圈里的天才
  8. 由“高考狀元”想到了毛主席教育革命
  9. 從‘10塊’到‘400塊’:新農合背后的沉重與希望——請對農民好一點
  10. 子午:請珍惜我們的社會主義傳統
  1. 孔慶東|做毛主席的好戰士,敢于戰斗,善于戰斗——紀念毛主席誕辰131年韶山講話
  2. “深水區”背后的階級較量,撕裂利益集團!
  3. 大蕭條的時代特征:歷史在重演
  4. 央媒的反腐片的確“驚艷”,可有誰想看續集?
  5. 瘋狂從老百姓口袋里掏錢,發現的時候已經怨聲載道了!
  6. 到底誰“封建”?
  7. 兩個草包經濟學家:向松祚、許小年
  8. 該來的還是來了,潤美殖人被遣返,資產被沒收,美吹群秒變美帝批判大會
  9. 掩耳盜鈴及其他
  10. 小崗村分田單干“合同書”之謎及其它
  1. 北京景山紅歌會隆重紀念毛主席逝世48周年
  2. 元龍:不換思想就換人?貪官頻出亂乾坤!
  3. 遼寧王忠新:必須直面“先富論”的“十大痛點”
  4. 劉教授的問題在哪
  5. 季羨林到底是什么樣的人
  6. 十一屆三中全會公報認為“顛倒歷史”的“右傾翻案風”,是否存在?
  7. 歷數阿薩德罪狀,觸目驚心!
  8. 陳中華:如果全面私有化,就沒革命的必要
  9. 我們還等什么?
  10. 只有李先念有理由有資格這樣發問!
  1. 車間主任焦裕祿
  2. 地圖未開疆,后院先失火
  3. 孔慶東|做毛主席的好戰士,敢于戰斗,善于戰斗——紀念毛主席誕辰131年韶山講話
  4. “當年明月”的病:其實是中國人的通病
  5. 重慶龍門浩寒風中的農民工:他們活該被剝削受凍、小心翼翼不好意思嗎?
  6. 央媒的反腐片的確“驚艷”,可有誰想看續集?