CNN今天就有關“ANTI-CNN”正式發表了聲明，丑陋嘴臉繼續張牙舞爪

作者：楊子
2008-03-28 23:33:25

CNN今天就有關西藏的報道和Anti-CNN.COM的出現正式發表了書面聲明。當然主要是為自己的一些失誤進行辯解---一是扔石頭的圖片，二是“誤”稱西藏當“國家”。并且CNN再次修改了它的有關圖片和圖片說明。

本來他們在經濟學人記者的八張照片下的注釋是這樣的：James Miles，the journal reporter of The Economist, took the photographs in Lhasa, the capital of Tibet Country. ----明顯地稱西藏為“國家”。

今天他發表聲明的同時，把James Miles照片下的解說詞改成了：James Miles，One of few western journalists in Tibet, took the photographs of the recent eruptions of anti-Chinese violence in Lhasa. 把“Tibet Country”給去掉了,并且寫成了“anti-Chinese"。

北京《西藏人文地理》主編曾經說過，“西藏無小事”，任何一個風吹草動都可能一發動全身。是啊，這個敏感地區，任何沖突和不快，都有可能在歷史上留下難于愈合的傷疤。對未來的沖擊可能誰也無法估計。其實種族和文化之間，無論誰對誰錯，相互和諧是主線。任何主張對立、分裂、仇視和報復，都是不可取的。規勸人和，不煽動仇恨，這是現代西方媒體最欠缺的品德，也是最不智的。保護任何少數族裔的文化，都是要在民族的和諧下才能實現。一些人主張西藏獨立并且希望恢復政教合一的農奴制，那真的不現實。公平地說，無論是由于社會發展的不平衡，還是由于別人的鼓動，要底層的藏人反對和騷擾底層的漢人和回族人，那都是令人痛惜的事---對下層的藏人來說，那于事無補，于己無利，與人無益，可說是兩敗俱傷、親者痛仇者快的事。

CNN用了20年的努力樹立了自己的形象，尤其在中國市場上占了一席之地。這次它真是大意失荊州。一個西藏的騷亂問題，何必片面來哉？現在CNN自己年輕一代的工作人員，急功近利、輕盲草率、無知偏見，幾度造成了對中國人民的巨大傷害，也造成了對他自己的傷害-----那就是他CNN在10億中國人心中的可信度，被自個給降低了。這大概是CNN近年來最大的滑鐵盧。CNN能不能保住他在中國已有的昭然地位，就要拭目以待了。

有人說，沒有偏見的媒體就不叫媒體了。你說，世界上真有無偏見的媒體嗎？既然每個媒體都說自己無偏見很公正，那重要的就是，我們讀者自己要知道誰是偏左的媒體，誰是偏右的媒體，不要被媒體完全左右就好了。一個媒體到底公正不公正，那是讀者本人說了算。如果一個報道被太多的人質疑，那就要檢討一個媒體的公允和誠實了。你說，CNN， 你說你客觀，那你為什么要去剪那一剪刀呢？你的偏見傾向太明顯了。你現在怎么辯解也于事無補了，只能越抹越黑，讓人覺得你不誠實。你還不如正視現實，說句對不起中國人民的話，那不是顯得你有風度，知錯能改，就是和大陸的媒體不一樣，那不更好嗎？就像當年臺灣第一家庭貪瀆事發，要是民進黨高風亮節，毅然決然地與貪圖的第一家庭割裂，要他引咎辭職或把他拉下馬，那今天的臺灣選舉一定就是另一個結局，臺灣的前途也會是另一個結局。由于民進黨的護短和不能當機立斷，結果把自己的全黨命運給搭進去了。難道CNN也要執迷不悟，在中國和西藏的問題上，為了一張照片的“錯誤”一味護短，而把自己的誠信和市場一并搭進去？

下面就是CNN的聲明原文：

CNN statement on Tibet coverage

(CNN) -- CNN has been singled out for criticism for our coverage of events in Tibet through an anti-CNN.com Web site and elsewhere. We have provided comprehensive coverage of all sides of this story, but two specific allegations relate to pro-Tibetan bias. We would like to take this chance to respond to them:
Allegation 1: CNN intentionally cropped an image in order to remove Tibetan protesters throwing stones at Chinese trucks.

CNN refutes all allegations by bloggers that it distorts its coverage of the events in Tibet to portray either side in a more favorable light. We have consistently and repeatedly shown all sides of this story. The one image in question was used wholly appropriately in the specific editorial context and there could be no confusion regarding what it was showing, not least because it was captioned: "Tibetans throw stones at army vehicles on a street in the capital Lhasa." The picture gallery included in Tibet stories includes the image. (See the gallery)

We have also published images showing violence by Tibetans against the Chinese. A March 18 story shows Tibetan youths attacking a Chinese man. (Read the story)

Additionally, we have published video from the Chinese media apparently showing Tibetans attacking Chinese interests in Lhasa. (Watch the video) »

Allegation 2: CNN referred to Tibet as a "country."

CNN's policy is to refer to Tibet as "Tibet Autonomous Region of China." In our dozens of stories on the topic to date, we are aware of only two instances where it was incorrectly referenced as a country.

CNN's reputation is based on reporting global news accurately and impartially, while our coverage through the use of words, images or video always reflects a wide range of opinions and points of view on every story.

-----------

其實，CNN聲明中所說的許多“全面”報道，都是在訪問James Miles之后才作出的。無論CNN如何表白，只要看看CNN在網上有關西藏問題的介紹，就知道他的預設立場了。
http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/03/23/china.tibet.ap/index.html#cnnSTCOther1，

Background On Tibet

Protests in Tibet have turned violent, with demonstrarors calling for an end to Chinese rule in the region. Click though to learn more about the history of the conflict. -----你看看，CNN是不是在作洗腦工作，其說教，有沒有片面和誤導無知的美國人，有沒有讓年輕的一代跟著他們所闡述的觀點走。讀者自有分辯。

Intruduction
Despite calls for Tibetan indepandence, the United States considers the Autonomous Region and other Tibetan areas part of China. in 2007, the tibetan population in all of these areas combined was about 5.7million. China troops invaded Tibet in 1950. soon after the communist Party came to power in China. The Dalai Lama participated in peace talks with Chinese Leasders from 1954 to 1959, but these dialogues were unsuccessful. The talks ended after the 1959 uprising. when thounsands of Tibetans were forced into exile. in 1973 the Dalai Lama rejected the Chinese government's offer to allow his return to Tibet in return for an acceptance of Chinese rule. Since then, the Dlai Lama has tried on numerous occatons to negotiate with the Chinese, He wants Tibet to have full autonomy.
很明顯，CNN把1950年以前，西藏就是”中華民國“國號下的一個區的事實給刪割了。CNN也不提達賴的封號就是”中華民國”主持的。他給人的明確印象就是，從1950中共侵略西藏之后，西藏才成了中國的一部分。這種截斷歷史達到誤導讀者的本領，真讓人感嘆。CNN只字不提歷史的西藏,沒有講從塞瑪王朝起，西藏就是元朝的一部分---連“喇嘛”這個詞，還是在元帝國的“感召"下,用蒙古語設立的。CNN也沒說，明永樂七年（1409年）藏傳佛教格魯派創始人宗咯巴就是明朝冊封的，他的第二代弟子的冊封和授號，都是在明帝國南京舉行的。CNN強調的字眼是“Chinese Troops Invades Tibet in1950”。那我問CNN，那1949年前，在藏區的國軍叫什么，西藏和民國南京的關系又是什么？再就是，1973年，達賴和中國政府本來講好了，文件就要簽署了，可達賴陣前反悔了---這可能就是中國政府不再相信達賴隔空喊話以及他做出的任何承諾。

The 1959 Uprising
Recent protests by Buddhist monks fell on the anniversary of the 1959 uprising. According to the Government of Tibet in Exile, the uprising began when the Chinese Army Command invited the Dalai Lama to a theatrical show on March 10, 1959, and told him he could not bring body guards. on that day, thousands of demonstrators surrounded the leader's palace to make sure he would not attend the show. During the next serveral days, Tibetans protested Chinese rule and demanded indepandence. Though the Dalai Lama tried to provent fighting between the Tibetans and the Chinese, violence erupted in the city of Lhasa. The Chinese army forced about 80,000 Tibetan refugees into exile at that time. The Dalai Lama left on March 17, 1959, to seek help in India.
----你看看，CNN只字不提CIA資助和策劃了1959年的西藏叛亂，也沒說達賴的大哥（當時在美國）就是CIA的執行人之一。那時達賴才24歲。也沒說達賴當時已經是“國家領導人”，更沒有說那時西藏的叛亂主要是奴隸主階級的反撲，而不是一般奴隸/藏民的叛亂。

March 2008 Protests
Hundreds of Monks began protesting on the 49th anniversary of the 1959 Tibetan uprising against Beijing Rule. Human Right groups and witnesses said protesters began to set fire to vehicles and shops in the capital of Lhasa on March 14. Tibetan exile groups said at leat 80 people died in the violence; China insisted security forces acted with restraint and killed no one. Chinese authorities sealed off three main monasteries and accused the exiled Dalai lama of provoking the unrest. Some witnesses said Tibetans were attacking ethnic Chinese residents. China's state-run Xinhua News Agency acknowledged March 20 that the anti-government riots in Tibet had spread to two Chinese provinces neighboring Tibet. The Dalai Lama said he had "no power to tell the movement to shut up".
----- 這段文字和上面的一樣，本來是18號前寫好掛在網上的，當時幾乎完全按照藏獨的觀點陳述。現在CNN改版了，而且你看到，他們把March 20之后的內容也加進去了。現在的陳述是在3/23號改變的內容上又修改過的。內容是相對客觀了些，掩蓋了他們原來的原有偏狹觀點。

The Dalai Lama
Tibet's spiritural leader is called His Holiness, the 14th Dalai lama Tenzin Gyatsu. Born in 1935 as Lhamo Dhondrub, the Dalai Lama currently lives in Dharamsala, India. Tibetan Buddhists beliebe that Dalai Lamas chose to reincarnate to serve the Bodhisattva(Buddha) of Compassion. The Dalai Lama says Tibetans should have full "meaningful autonomy" to protect their cultural heritage. He has also said the Chinese treat Tibetans like second-class citizens in their own country. Many young Tibetan activists want full independence. China calls the Dalai Lama a separatist, and the overnment dismiss international calls for talks with him. He says he will resign his leadership of the Tibetan government in exile if the protests worsen.
-----這段是CNN對達賴的陳述。達賴要求"西藏完全自治” “來保護他們的傳統文化”，理論上是很合理，但能行得通嗎？那就像北美的原住民也可以要求"北美完全自治” “來保護他們的傳統文化”，不也一樣挺合理？你說，要北美的外來人全離開，那能行得通嗎？一樣的道理，一樣的邏輯，CNN就沒有想想，你說中國不理國際呼吁，那北美的外來人（包括你CNN）是不是也去呼吁美國/加國政府跟原住民談談“完全自治”的問題？自己做不到的事，又怎么要人去做呢？

再說，達賴和藏青會的主張是：一，西藏在歷史上和文化上都是一個獨立國家，不是中國的一部分；二，要將中國軍隊和軍事設施從西藏撤走，西藏地位交由國際會議討論，西藏成為“和平區”“緩沖國”；三，西藏可與其他國家或國際組織保持外交關系；四，堅持在包括青海、甘肅、四川、云南等省藏區在內的240多萬平方公里的“大藏區”實行“真正自治”，全部事務全由十四世達賴喇嘛來管；五，要把非藏族群眾從“大藏區”遷走。你說說，哪個國家可以與一個地區對這樣的話？達賴的弟弟丹增曲杰在接受美國媒體采訪時明確地說，西藏的“和平五點計劃”和斯特拉斯堡的“七點新建議”都是一樣的，“我們就是先求自治，然后把他們中國人趕走”。-----你說，北美原住民如果談判條件是要把“非原居民都趕走”，那還有得談？

Human Right
The U.S.State Department in 2007 found a repression of religious freedom in Tibetan areas of China and that there was a general continuation of Human right abuses. These include torture and arbitrary arrest abd detention, according to the State Department. Among other violation cited, Chinese authorities often failed to notify relatives or employers of arrested persons within 24 hours of the arrest as required by law. The Chinese government also instituted new controls over the practice of Tibetan Buddhism, according to the State Department. China‘s Ministry of Culture blocked information about tibet on the interent in China. Authorities forced the largest Chinese-language Tibet-related Web site, tibetcul.com, to delete content and increase its control over blogs.
----這是CNN引用美國政府的話來講西藏的人權。既然你是美國政府的口舌，還有什么中立和公正可言？！你老說中國媒體是政府的傳聲筒，這段話又是什么？再說，美國政府的話和數據你也信？！怪不得當年有超過50%的美國人都支持伊拉克戰爭。結果怎么樣，誰對誰錯，短短的四年歷史已經昭然若揭。

× 烏有之鄉 WYZXWK.COM

您的打賞將用于網站日常運行與維護。
幫助我們辦好網站，宣傳紅色文化！

歡迎掃描下方二維碼，訂閱烏有之鄉網刊微信公眾號