美國政府醫學研究所承認注射疫苗有嚴重副作用！
關鍵詞：疫苗 疫苗副作用 疫苗機制 疫苗污染 病毒 流產胚細胞 危害健康
美國政府藥學研究所（IOM）在審查了1000多項疫苗研究之后發現14種危險的副作用與注射疫苗相關后不久前承認：“疫苗并非無副作用，或并非無‘負面作用’” 。美國國家疫苗信息中心（NVIC）關于藥學研究所（IOM）的報告最近發表的聲明強調“這次的審查受到有關疫苗負面影響知識缺口的束縛”；“真相是，沒有任何人知道在美國有多少疫苗受害者：沒有人知道在每6個孩子中為什么有一名有學習障礙的孩子；或者每9個孩子中為什么有一名有氣喘的孩子；或者每100個美國人中為什么有1名患孤獨癥；或者每450個美國人中為什么有1名患糖尿病，他們的慢性抑郁癥、疾病與殘疾能夠回追到疫苗反應，這些疫苗反應過去百年來一直被公共健康官員與醫生們忽略不考慮為僅僅是‘巧合’”。本文及其系列文章還揭示：注射疫苗并不時我們更加健康；自然免疫力與疫苗激發免疫力的區別？世界最知名葛蘭素--史克疫苗生產公司疫苗對美國百萬兒童、對世界各地3000多萬兒童注射后竟然發現受到豬病毒DNA的污染；長期以來向公眾掩蓋的一項令人震驚的事實：某些疫苗生產中與美容護膚霜中使用了人類流產胚細胞；無良商家與官方勾結推動某些疫苗的真正目的是利潤而非健康！
Vaccines Have Serious Side Effects The Institute of Medicine Says So!
美國政府醫學研究所承認：注射疫苗有嚴重副作用！
轉載自：
翻譯與轉載者：陳一文（[email protected]）
（80年代兩屆全國青聯委員）
《新浪網》“陳一文顧問博客”轉載：http://blog.sina.com.cn/cheniwan
《陳一文顧問網站》：http://sea3000.net/cheniwan
By Dr. Mercola | September 27 2011
作者：莫克拉博士 發布日期：2011年9月27日
As I have long stated, and the Institute of Medicine (IOM) now admits:
如同我早就聲明的那樣，美國政府藥學研究所（Institute of Medicine -- IOM）現在也承認：
"Vaccines are not free from side effects, or "adverse effects""
“疫苗并非無副作用，或并非無‘負面作用’”
This admission came after a review of more than 1,000 vaccine studies, which was intended to assess the scientific evidence in the medical literature about specific adverse events associated with eight vaccines for measles, mumps, rubella (MMR); varicella (chickenpox); influenza; hepatitis A; hepatitis B; HPV; diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis (DtaP); and meningococcal.
這一點是在審查了1000多項疫苗研究之后承認的。這些疫苗研究的目的是評估醫學文獻中關于八種具體的疫苗相關的特點負面作用的科學證據。這八種疫苗針對（1）麻疹--腮腺炎--風疹MMR疫苗（measles-- mumps--rubella – MMR）；（2）水痘（varicella – chickenpox）；（3）流行性感冒（influenza）；（4）甲型肝炎（hepatitis A）；（5）乙型肝炎（hepatitis B）；（6）人乳頭狀病毒（HPV）；（7）白喉（diphtheria）、破傷風（tetanus）、非細胞的百日咳（acellular pertussis – DtaP）；與 （8）腦膜炎（meningococca）。
The adverse events selected for IOM review were ones for which people had submitted vaccine injury claims to the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). A convincing causal relationship was found for 14 adverse events and certain vaccines.
藥學研究所選擇進行審查的疫苗負面事件是人們提交給“疫苗損傷賠償計劃（Vaccine Injury Compensation Program -- VICP）的疫苗損傷索賠中報告的負面事件。對某些疫苗發現令人信服的因果關系的14種負面事件。
14 Dangerous Side Effects Linked to Vaccination, IOM Report Says
美國政府醫學研究所承認：有14種危險的副作用與注射疫苗相關
In the first comprehensive safety review in nearly two decades, the Institute of Medicine found convincing scientic evidence for a causal relationship between certain vaccines and serious adverse health outcomes. This includes:
近二十年來第一次這樣的綜合性安全審查中，美國政府醫學研究所發現了某些疫苗與嚴重的負面健康結果之間的有說服力的科學證據。它們包括：
Chickenpox Vaccine
水痘疫苗
l Vaccine strain varicella zoster infection after vaccination without other organ involvement;
l 疫苗注射后出現了不涉及其他器官的疫苗株水痘帶狀疹子感染；
l Vaccine strain varicella zoster infection and subsequent infection resulting in pneumonia, encephalitis, meningitis or hepatitis in individuals with demonstrated immunodeficiences;
l 疫苗株水痘帶狀疹子感染以及隨后在表現免疫缺陷的個人中造成肺炎（pneumonia）、 腦炎（encephalitis）、腦膜炎（meningitis）或肝炎（hepatitis）。
Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) Vaccine
麻疹—腮腺炎—風疹（MMR）疫苗
l Measles inclusion body encephalitis
l 麻疹包涵體腦炎
l Febrile seizures, a type of seizure that occurs in infants and young children in association with fever
l 急性發熱（Febrile seizures），在嬰幼兒與兒童發生的伴隨發燒的一種急性癥
l Short-term joint pain (arthralgia) in children and women
l 兒童與婦女中出現短期關節痛（arthralgia）
Other findings revealed:
其他的發現揭示：
l Six types of vaccines -- MMR, varicella zoster (chickenpox), influenza, hepatitis B, meningococcal, and tetanus-containing vaccines -- are linked to anaphylaxis (severe, potentially life-threatening allergic reaction). The HPV vaccine was also linked to anaphylaxis in yeast-sensitive individuals.
l 六種疫苗 -- （1）麻疹--腮腺炎--風疹MMR疫苗（measles-- mumps--rubella – MMR）、（2）水痘帶狀疹子疫苗（varicella zoster, chickenpox）、（3）流行性感冒疫苗（influenza）、（4）乙型肝炎疫苗（hepatitis B）、（5）腦膜炎疫苗（meningococcal）與（6）破傷風疫苗（tetanus）與過敏反應（anaphylaxis）有關聯（嚴重的、潛在危害生命的過敏反應）。人乳頭狀病毒疫苗也與酵母過敏個人中的過敏反應（anaphylaxis）相關。
l Injection of any vaccine in general can lead to sudden fainting (syncope) and symptoms of deltoid bursitis, or shoulder inflammation
l 注射任何這些疫苗總的來講能夠導致土壤昏暈昏厥（syncope）以及三角肌滑液囊炎（deltoid bursitis），或者肩膀炎癥（inflammation）。
l Two Canadian flu vaccines were linked to oculo-respiratory syndrome characterized by conjunctivitis, facial swelling, and mild respiratory symptoms.
l 兩種加拿大流行性感冒疫苗與奧庫拉呼吸系統綜合癥（oculo-respiratory syndrome）相關，特征包括結膜炎（conjunctivitis）、面部腫脹（facial swelling）以及溫和的呼吸系統癥狀（mild respiratory symptoms）。
l Scientific research suggests that many people, who experience an adverse reaction to vaccines, have individual susceptibility that can make them at higher risk for experiencing acute and chronic health problems after vaccination due to biodiversity (genetic variations) within populations; age at the time of vaccination; immune deficiencies; coinciding infections/illnesses; and other environmental exposures, (such as toxins, traumas).
l 科學研究提議，對疫苗有負面反應經歷的許多人，具有個性化的易受損害脆弱性，使他們在相同人群中在疫苗注射后對急性的與慢性的健康問題因下述因素具有更高風險，如生物多樣性（基因不同）；注射疫苗的年齡與時間；免疫缺陷；同時有感染/疾病；其他環境性暴露（如毒素、外傷）。
Too Little Evidence Available to Effectively Evaluate Most Side Effects
對評估大部分副作用來講可以獲得的證據太少
Despite conclusive findings by IOM linking certain vaccines to brain inflammation, febrile seizures and potentially life-threatening infections like pneumonia and meningitis in susceptible individuals, most of the media headlines about the IOM’s 600-page report are spinning the reports conclusions and stating that “few adverse effects are caused by the vaccines reviewed in this report.”
盡管美國政府藥學研究所（IOM）確鑿發現某些疫苗與某些癥狀有關聯，如腦部炎癥（brain inflammation）、急性發熱（febrile seizures）、已遭受損害脆弱個人中像肺炎（pneumonia）與腦膜炎（meningitis）這樣的潛在威脅生命的感染，大部分媒體關于藥學研究所（IOM）這個600頁報告的頭條將報告的結論描繪為“這個報告伸出了疫苗造成的少數一些負面影響。”
The truth is that the IOM Committee came to this startling conclusion, which they admitted openly and that is:
真實的情況是藥學研究所獲得他們令人震驚的結論時公開承認
"For the vast majority, (135 vaccine-adverse event pairs), the evidence is inadequate to accept or reject a causal relationship."
“對絕大多數，（135項疫苗—負面事件對），獲得的證據不足于接受或者否定一項因果關系。”
In other words, for the majority of side effects and health conditions that have occurred in conjunction with vaccinations, they simply have no idea whether the vaccine caused the problem or not. In fact, the IOM Committee warned that there should be no misinterpretation of the fact that they DO NOT KNOW whether or not more than 100 very serious reported health problems linked to the eight vaccines they studied are caused by those vaccines. In most cases, the Committee was unable to come to a conclusion because there are no or very few scientific studies investigating the reported vaccine-related adverse event or the studies, which are published in the medical literature, are methodologically flawed in some way.
換句話說，對于與疫苗注射后發生的大部分副作用與健康狀況而言，他們完全不懂疫苗注射是否導致出現了的問題。事實上，藥學研究所的委員會警告，對如下情況不應做誤導性解釋：他們不知道100種所報告的與八種疫苗相關聯的非常嚴重健康問題是由這些疫苗造成的，還是不是由它們造成的。在大部分情況下，該委員會未能夠取得結論的原因，是因為醫學文獻中僅發表了很少對疫苗相關負面事件或研究進行審查的科學研究論文，而且它們采用的方法學在一定程度上有缺陷。
And isn’t this precisely the problem? The current vaccination schedule is a one-size-fits-all approach that has never been proven safe!
這不準確就是問題所在？目前的疫苗安排是“同一劑量滿足所有的人”的方式，但是這種方式從來沒有證實是安全的！
As Barbara Loe Fisher, founder of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), stated:
如芭芭拉·羅·費舍（Barbara Loe Fisher），國家疫苗信息中心（National Vaccine Information Center -- NVIC）創立者強調：
"The truth is, nobody knows how many vaccine victims there are in America, how many of the 1 in 6 learning disabled children; or the 1 in 9 with asthma; or the 1 in 100 who develop autism; or the 1 in 450 who become diabetic, can trace their chronic inflammation, disease and disability back to vaccine reactions that have been dismissed by public health officials and doctors for the past century as just "a coincidence.""
“真相是，沒有任何人知道在美國有多少疫苗受害者：沒有人知道在每6個孩子中為什么有一名有學習障礙（learning disabled）的孩子；或者每9個孩子中為什么有一名有氣喘（asthma）的孩子；或者每100個美國人中為什么有1名患孤獨癥（autism）；或者每450個美國人中為什么有1名患糖尿病（diabetic），他們的慢性抑郁癥（inflammation）、疾病與殘疾能夠回追到疫苗反應，這些疫苗反應過去百年來一直被公共健康官員與醫生們忽略不考慮為僅僅是‘巧合’”。
Or, if they aren’t dismissed as coincidence, they are dismissed on the grounds that there’s not enough data available to establish a “causal relationship.” This is exactly the reason why unbiased vaccine safety studies are so desperately and urgently need.
或者，如果它們沒有作為“巧合”忽略不考慮，它們在沒有建立“因果關系”足夠數據基礎上不予考慮。這就是為什么無偏見的疫苗安全研究如此緊急必要。
NVIC recently issued a statement regarding IOM's new report, noting this very fact:
國家疫苗信息中心（NVIC）最近發表了關于美國政府藥學研究所新的報告的一個聲明，特別關注這一事實：
"The [IOM] Committee was hampered by the same gaps in knowledge regarding vaccine adverse effects that hampered IOM Committees undertaking the same task in 1991 and 1994. For the majority of potential vaccine adverse effects reported to be associated with vaccines, this IOM Committee like those before, came to the conclusion that the biological mechanism and epidemiological evidence published in the medical literature is simply inadequate to accept or reject a causation finding.
“（藥學研究所）委員會這次的審查受到有關疫苗負面影響知識缺口的束縛，與藥學研究所委員會1991年與1994年承擔同樣任務時受到的有關疫苗負面影響知識缺口束縛相同。對于報告中涉及到的與疫苗相關聯的大部分潛在疫苗負面影響，這個藥學研究所委員會像他們以前一樣，得到結論：醫學文獻中發表的鴨血生物學機制與流行病學證據不足以接受或否定一項顯示因果關系的發現。
This is a very important conclusion, because the current state of science holds no answers for parents and doctors, who for many years have reported multiple vaccine injuries to the government's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).
“這是一項重要的結論，因為目前狀態的科學對孩子們的家長與醫生們給不出答案，他們多年來向政府的‘疫苗負面事件報告系統（Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System -- VAERS）’報告了多重疫苗損傷。
Insufficient scientific evidence to make a call about whether certain vaccines do or do not cause a wide range of serious health conditions, such as encephalitis, encephalopathy, stroke, asthma, autism, SIDS, multiple sclerosis, arthritis, lupus, and blood disorders, is problematical when these vaccines are mandated by law to be used by every child and recommended for many adults.
“對與某些疫苗是或者不造成廣泛范圍嚴重健康狀況，例如腦炎（encephalitis）、腦病（encephalopathy）、中風（stroke）、哮喘（asthma）、孤獨癥（autism）、嬰兒猝死綜合癥（SIDS）、多發性硬化癥（multiple sclerosis）、關節炎（arthritis）、狼瘡（lupus）以及血液失調（blood disorders），在法規強制規定對每個孩子以及推薦對許多成年人注射這些疫苗情況下，由于缺乏足夠科學證據而不能發出警告就成了一個大問題。
The Committee's clear acknowledgement that there is a lack of adequate scientific understanding about the way that vaccines act in the human body, including how, when, why and for whom they are harmful, is confirmation that more and higher quality vaccine safety science is urgently needed."
（藥學研究所）委員會清楚承認缺乏關于疫苗在人類體內如何如何作用的足夠科學理解，包括缺乏各種疫苗如何、何時、為什么以及它們對什么樣的人有害的足夠科學理解，這確認目前緊急需要高質量的疫苗安全科學。”
Why Are So Many Children Receiving Extra Vaccines?
為什么這么多的孩子注射額外次數疫苗？
Adding insult to injury, a separate review by independent researchers looking at the 1999-2003 National Immunization Survey data found that nearly 10 percent of children aged 19-35 months have received extra vaccinations and the rate was highest for children who received vaccines at more than one facility or from more than one provider. This is the last thing that kids need, considering that just about every year one or more “new” vaccines are added to the already overloaded schedule.
令疫苗造成的損傷更為糟糕，由獨立研究者們進行的一項單獨的審查對1999-2003年度國家免疫調查（National Immunization Survey）數據進行了研究，發現19-35個月年齡兒童的10%獲得額外次數疫苗注射，而且，對于從一家以上機構或多家提供方獲得疫苗的兒童的額外疫苗次數最高。這是孩子們所需要的最后一件事，特別考慮到每年出現一種或更多種“新”的疫苗出現加入到目前已經過載的安排。
As it stands, children are expected to get 48 doses of 14 vaccines by the time they’re just 6 years old – starting with the first vaccine given on the day of birth in the newborn nursery! By age 18, federal public health officials say they should have gotten a total of 69 doses of 16 vaccines.
從目前情況看，現在的孩子到他們6歲時生長過程中應期望注射14種疫苗總共注射48次 – 從出生第一天在新生兒室注射第一次疫苗開始！到18歲時，聯邦公共健康官員說，他們注射了16種總共69次疫苗。
This “prescription” is the same for every U.S. child, even though it’s well known that all children are not the same biologically – as the recent Institute of Medicine report clearly points out - and some children will not be able to survive the currently recommended vaccine schedule without suffering serious harm to their health. And if you take your child to multiple health care providers or facilities, the odds are high that they may be mistakenly given “extra” vaccines on top of the recommended schedule.
美國每一個孩子獲得相同這樣的“處方”，盡管人們都了解所有的孩子在生物學方面并不相同 – 如同藥學研究所最近的報告清楚指出的那樣 – 某些孩子不能承受目前推薦的疫苗安排因而造成對他們健康嚴重的損傷。如果你帶你的孩子去多家保健服務提供者或機構的話，他們錯誤地“額外”注射他們最為推薦安排的疫苗的幾率較高。
To avoid this, if you do decide to vaccinate, be sure you keep a detailed record of which vaccinations your child has received, and when – do not rely on your doctor’s office to do that for you. It is also a good idea to have your child’s vaccination history on hand in the event there is a vaccine reaction.
為了避免這種情況，如果你決定注射疫苗的話，一定確保你保留這你的孩子過去注射過的所有疫苗的詳細記錄，以及何時注射 – 而不要依賴于你的醫生的辦公室為你這樣做。出現疫苗反應時，隨身攜帶你的孩子的疫苗注射歷史記錄是一個好主意。
You Can View Common Vaccine Reactions Right Now
你現在可以看通常的疫苗反應
The IOM report may feel there is too little evidence to make conclusions about vaccine-induced side effects, but you can make a conclusion for yourself by reading the entire IOM report yourself at:
藥學研究所可能感到做出對某些疫苗導致副作用結論的證據過少，但是你可以通過讀整個報告做出自己的結論：
http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2011/Adverse-Effects-of-Vaccines-Evidence-and-Causality.aspx
You can also review the vaccine adverse event reports made by doctors and patients or parents themselves to the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a national surveillance database to which anyone can post a vaccine reaction report. VAERS was established in 1986 under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which requires health professionals to report serious health problems, including hospitalizations, injuries and deaths, that occur after the administration of routinely recommended vaccines.
你也可以審查醫生與患者或者家長們自己向聯邦“疫苗負面事件報告系統”（Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System -- VAERS）的疫苗負面事件報告。這是任何人可以提交疫苗反應報告的國家監視網。“疫苗負面事件報告系統”1986年依據“國家兒童疫苗損傷法令”（National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act）建立，要求健康專業人士報告嚴重的健康問題，包括注射常規推薦一秒后發生的住院治療、損傷與死亡事件。
An important aspect of VAERS is that anyone can both read and post vaccine adverse events to this database. So if your doctor discounts your concerns about vaccination (or afterward, if your child regresses or gets ill after a vaccine), you can verify or report them yourself -- and people are doing just that when doctors or other vaccine providers refuse to report to VAERS after a vaccine reaction occurs.
“疫苗負面事件報告系統”的一個重要方面是，任何人士都可以閱讀該系統數據庫中的疫苗負面事件報告，也可以向這個系統提交這樣的報告。因此，如果你的醫生不考慮你對疫苗注射提出的擔心（或者不考慮注射疫苗后出現的異常或病癥），你可以訪問該系統閱讀其他的報告進行自己的驗證，或者可以自己提交注射疫苗后出現異常或病癥的報告 – 當醫生或其他疫苗提供方在發生疫苗反應后拒絕報告時，人們就是這樣做。
You can access VAERS here, or you can go to Medalarts.org, which provides an easy, powerful search engine for looking up specific reactions or vaccines in the VAERS database. With over 70 vaccines included, VAERS is an excellent tool that can help you read descriptions of vaccine reactions and identify which vaccines are associated with the most side effects.
你可以直接訪問“疫苗負面事件報告系統”（VAERS），或者訪問http://www.Medalarts.org ，后者提供對VAERS系統數據庫中特定反應或特定疫苗的一個使用方便、強有力的搜索引擎。包括有70多種疫苗的VAERS系統數據庫是一個優良的工具，可以幫助你閱讀疫苗反應的描述，并且識別哪些疫苗與絕大部分副作用相關聯。
It is important to know, though, that only a tiny fraction of serious health problems that occur after vaccination are actually reported. Studies have estimated that less than 10 percent, to as little as ONE percent of vaccine side effects are ever reported to VAERS, so the true side effects are easily FAR higher than the statistics show.
了解下述情況很重要，注射疫苗以后出現的嚴重健康問題中實際上僅有很小數量實際進行報告。研究表明，少到10%，以至更少到1%的疫苗副作用事件最終被報告給VAERS系統，因此真實的副作用比例很容易遠遠高于VAERS系統數據庫表明的統計數字。
Are You Ready to Get Educated About Vaccines?
你準備好獲得關于疫苗的教育沒有？
The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) is clearly the leading Internet resource, providing objective, unbiased information that you will need to make intelligent, informed decisions about which vaccines you, your children or other members of your family may want to use.
國家疫苗信息中心（NVIC）明顯是這方面領先的互聯網信息來源，提供幫助你對你自己、你的孩子以及你家里其他成員可能需要注射哪些疫苗做出聰明的、知情情況下決定的客觀的、非偏見的信息。
If you have further questions about vaccination, make sure you consult a trusted health care professional, who has taken the time to become educated personally about vaccines. And if your doctor threatens or belittles you, refuses to treat your family if you want to use an alternative vaccination schedule, or will not take the time to discuss your vaccine concerns with you and allow you to make informed, voluntary vaccination decisions, I suggest you find one who will. Remember, it is your choice and your responsibility to get educated about vaccination, and your doctor should treat you with respect and work with you on this.
如果你們對于疫苗注射有進一步的問題，一定確保自己向一位值得信任的保健專業人士進行咨詢，他曾花費時間使自己成為關于疫苗的受過教育的人士。而且，如果你的醫生在你們要求使用另外可選擇的疫苗注射安排情況下威脅或輕視你，或者不愿意花費時間與你討論你對于疫苗的擔心是你能夠做出知情情況下自愿接受疫苗注射的決定，我建議你找到另外能夠這樣做的醫生。請記住，是你自己的選擇以及你自己的責任獲得關于疫苗的教育，你的醫生應當在這個問題上尊重你和配合你。
I also encourage you to get involved with the work that NVIC is doing to protect your right to choose which vaccines you want your children to get, including the legal right to use all, some, or no vaccines at all. Register for the free NVIC Advocacy Portal that educates you about threats to your legal right to make vaccine choices and puts you directly in contact with your elected state representatives so you can help protect vaccine exemptions in your state. Stay informed about what is happening in your state and make your voice heard.
我也鼓勵你參與國家疫苗信息中心（NVIC）在從事的工作，他們工作的目的是保護你選擇你愿意你的孩子接受何種疫苗注射的權利，包括接受所有疫苗注射、選擇其中一部分以至全部不選擇的法律權利。你可以免費注冊你的NVIC擁護者入口，它將教育你了解對你的做出疫苗注射選擇的權利可能面臨的威脅，同時安排你與被選舉的你們州的代表直接聯系，以便你可以在你們州幫助保護疫苗免注射權。你應當保持了解你們州與此有關情況的進展，同時讓人們聽到你的聲音。
Go to www.NVICAdvocacy.org and register today to take action.
建議你訪問www.NVICAdvocacy.org并且今天注冊采取行動。
Source: Health Freedoms September 6, 2011：Vaccines Are Dangerous – The Government Says So!
信息來源：《健康自由網站》2011年9月6日文章《疫苗有危險 – 政府這樣說！》
http://healthfreedoms.org/2011/09/06/vaccines-are-dangerous-the-government-says-so/
Source: Institute of Medicine: Adverse Effects of Vaccines: Evidence and Causality August 25, 2011
信息來源：美國政府《藥學研究所網站》2011年8月25日論文《疫苗的負面影響：證據與因果關系》
http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2011/Adverse-Effects-of-Vaccines-Evidence-and-Causality.aspx
信息來源：公共健康報告《作為（缺乏統一系統的—譯注）分裂性保健臨床標志的額外免疫》，發表于：公共健康報告，2011年7月-8月；126增刊2：48-50
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21812169
Source: Green Med Info: Extra-immunization is associated with receiving immunizations from multiple providers and multiple facility types.
信息來源：綠色醫學信息：額外免疫與從多重提供方與多重保健機構接受免疫相關
Related Links:
相關鏈接：
A Parent's Horrid Nightmare: Coming Soon to YOUR State?
一位孩子家長可怕的噩夢：很快也來到你的州？
Should Pediatricians 'Fire' Patients Whose Parents Don't Vaccinate?
小兒科醫生是否有權“開除”不接受疫苗注射的家長的患兒（節錄）
One of the Most Inexcusable Vaccine Revelations of All...
最為不可寬恕的揭露出來的與疫苗有關的事（節錄）：
本文相關系列必須一起研究的文章：
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4bb17e9d0102du25.html
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4bb17e9d0102du24.html
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4bb17e9d0102du21.html
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4bb17e9d0102du20.html
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4bb17e9d0102du1x.html
美國政府醫學研究所承認注射疫苗有嚴重副作用！
關鍵詞：疫苗 疫苗副作用 疫苗機制 疫苗污染 病毒 流產胚細胞 危害健康
美國政府藥學研究所（IOM）在審查了1000多項疫苗研究之后發現14種危險的副作用與注射疫苗相關后不久前承認：“疫苗并非無副作用，或并非無‘負面作用’” 。美國國家疫苗信息中心（NVIC）關于藥學研究所（IOM）的報告最近發表的聲明強調“這次的審查受到有關疫苗負面影響知識缺口的束縛”；“真相是，沒有任何人知道在美國有多少疫苗受害者：沒有人知道在每6個孩子中為什么有一名有學習障礙的孩子；或者每9個孩子中為什么有一名有氣喘的孩子；或者每100個美國人中為什么有1名患孤獨癥；或者每450個美國人中為什么有1名患糖尿病，他們的慢性抑郁癥、疾病與殘疾能夠回追到疫苗反應，這些疫苗反應過去百年來一直被公共健康官員與醫生們忽略不考慮為僅僅是‘巧合’”。本文及其系列文章還揭示：注射疫苗并不時我們更加健康；自然免疫力與疫苗激發免疫力的區別？世界最知名葛蘭素--史克疫苗生產公司疫苗對美國百萬兒童、對世界各地3000多萬兒童注射后竟然發現受到豬病毒DNA的污染；長期以來向公眾掩蓋的一項令人震驚的事實：某些疫苗生產中與美容護膚霜中使用了人類流產胚細胞；無良商家與官方勾結推動某些疫苗的真正目的是利潤而非健康！
Vaccines Have Serious Side Effects The Institute of Medicine Says So!
美國政府醫學研究所承認：注射疫苗有嚴重副作用！
轉載自：
翻譯與轉載者：陳一文（[email protected]）
（80年代兩屆全國青聯委員）
《新浪網》“陳一文顧問博客”轉載：http://blog.sina.com.cn/cheniwan
《陳一文顧問網站》：http://sea3000.net/cheniwan
By Dr. Mercola | September 27 2011
作者：莫克拉博士 發布日期：2011年9月27日
As I have long stated, and the Institute of Medicine (IOM) now admits:
如同我早就聲明的那樣，美國政府藥學研究所（Institute of Medicine -- IOM）現在也承認：
"Vaccines are not free from side effects, or "adverse effects""
“疫苗并非無副作用，或并非無‘負面作用’”
This admission came after a review of more than 1,000 vaccine studies, which was intended to assess the scientific evidence in the medical literature about specific adverse events associated with eight vaccines for measles, mumps, rubella (MMR); varicella (chickenpox); influenza; hepatitis A; hepatitis B; HPV; diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis (DtaP); and meningococcal.
這一點是在審查了1000多項疫苗研究之后承認的。這些疫苗研究的目的是評估醫學文獻中關于八種具體的疫苗相關的特點負面作用的科學證據。這八種疫苗針對（1）麻疹--腮腺炎--風疹MMR疫苗（measles-- mumps--rubella – MMR）；（2）水痘（varicella – chickenpox）；（3）流行性感冒（influenza）；（4）甲型肝炎（hepatitis A）；（5）乙型肝炎（hepatitis B）；（6）人乳頭狀病毒（HPV）；（7）白喉（diphtheria）、破傷風（tetanus）、非細胞的百日咳（acellular pertussis – DtaP）；與 （8）腦膜炎（meningococca）。
The adverse events selected for IOM review were ones for which people had submitted vaccine injury claims to the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). A convincing causal relationship was found for 14 adverse events and certain vaccines.
藥學研究所選擇進行審查的疫苗負面事件是人們提交給“疫苗損傷賠償計劃（Vaccine Injury Compensation Program -- VICP）的疫苗損傷索賠中報告的負面事件。對某些疫苗發現令人信服的因果關系的14種負面事件。
14 Dangerous Side Effects Linked to Vaccination, IOM Report Says
美國政府醫學研究所承認：有14種危險的副作用與注射疫苗相關
In the first comprehensive safety review in nearly two decades, the Institute of Medicine found convincing scientic evidence for a causal relationship between certain vaccines and serious adverse health outcomes. This includes:
近二十年來第一次這樣的綜合性安全審查中，美國政府醫學研究所發現了某些疫苗與嚴重的負面健康結果之間的有說服力的科學證據。它們包括：
Chickenpox Vaccine
水痘疫苗
l Vaccine strain varicella zoster infection after vaccination without other organ involvement;
l 疫苗注射后出現了不涉及其他器官的疫苗株水痘帶狀疹子感染；
l Vaccine strain varicella zoster infection and subsequent infection resulting in pneumonia, encephalitis, meningitis or hepatitis in individuals with demonstrated immunodeficiences;
l 疫苗株水痘帶狀疹子感染以及隨后在表現免疫缺陷的個人中造成肺炎（pneumonia）、 腦炎（encephalitis）、腦膜炎（meningitis）或肝炎（hepatitis）。
Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) Vaccine
麻疹—腮腺炎—風疹（MMR）疫苗
l Measles inclusion body encephalitis
l 麻疹包涵體腦炎
l Febrile seizures, a type of seizure that occurs in infants and young children in association with fever
l 急性發熱（Febrile seizures），在嬰幼兒與兒童發生的伴隨發燒的一種急性癥
l Short-term joint pain (arthralgia) in children and women
l 兒童與婦女中出現短期關節痛（arthralgia）
Other findings revealed:
其他的發現揭示：
l Six types of vaccines -- MMR, varicella zoster (chickenpox), influenza, hepatitis B, meningococcal, and tetanus-containing vaccines -- are linked to anaphylaxis (severe, potentially life-threatening allergic reaction). The HPV vaccine was also linked to anaphylaxis in yeast-sensitive individuals.
l 六種疫苗 -- （1）麻疹--腮腺炎--風疹MMR疫苗（measles-- mumps--rubella – MMR）、（2）水痘帶狀疹子疫苗（varicella zoster, chickenpox）、（3）流行性感冒疫苗（influenza）、（4）乙型肝炎疫苗（hepatitis B）、（5）腦膜炎疫苗（meningococcal）與（6）破傷風疫苗（tetanus）與過敏反應（anaphylaxis）有關聯（嚴重的、潛在危害生命的過敏反應）。人乳頭狀病毒疫苗也與酵母過敏個人中的過敏反應（anaphylaxis）相關。
l Injection of any vaccine in general can lead to sudden fainting (syncope) and symptoms of deltoid bursitis, or shoulder inflammation
l 注射任何這些疫苗總的來講能夠導致土壤昏暈昏厥（syncope）以及三角肌滑液囊炎（deltoid bursitis），或者肩膀炎癥（inflammation）。
l Two Canadian flu vaccines were linked to oculo-respiratory syndrome characterized by conjunctivitis, facial swelling, and mild respiratory symptoms.
l 兩種加拿大流行性感冒疫苗與奧庫拉呼吸系統綜合癥（oculo-respiratory syndrome）相關，特征包括結膜炎（conjunctivitis）、面部腫脹（facial swelling）以及溫和的呼吸系統癥狀（mild respiratory symptoms）。
l Scientific research suggests that many people, who experience an adverse reaction to vaccines, have individual susceptibility that can make them at higher risk for experiencing acute and chronic health problems after vaccination due to biodiversity (genetic variations) within populations; age at the time of vaccination; immune deficiencies; coinciding infections/illnesses; and other environmental exposures, (such as toxins, traumas).
l 科學研究提議，對疫苗有負面反應經歷的許多人，具有個性化的易受損害脆弱性，使他們在相同人群中在疫苗注射后對急性的與慢性的健康問題因下述因素具有更高風險，如生物多樣性（基因不同）；注射疫苗的年齡與時間；免疫缺陷；同時有感染/疾病；其他環境性暴露（如毒素、外傷）。
Too Little Evidence Available to Effectively Evaluate Most Side Effects
對評估大部分副作用來講可以獲得的證據太少
Despite conclusive findings by IOM linking certain vaccines to brain inflammation, febrile seizures and potentially life-threatening infections like pneumonia and meningitis in susceptible individuals, most of the media headlines about the IOM’s 600-page report are spinning the reports conclusions and stating that “few adverse effects are caused by the vaccines reviewed in this report.”
盡管美國政府藥學研究所（IOM）確鑿發現某些疫苗與某些癥狀有關聯，如腦部炎癥（brain inflammation）、急性發熱（febrile seizures）、已遭受損害脆弱個人中像肺炎（pneumonia）與腦膜炎（meningitis）這樣的潛在威脅生命的感染，大部分媒體關于藥學研究所（IOM）這個600頁報告的頭條將報告的結論描繪為“這個報告伸出了疫苗造成的少數一些負面影響。”
The truth is that the IOM Committee came to this startling conclusion, which they admitted openly and that is:
真實的情況是藥學研究所獲得他們令人震驚的結論時公開承認
"For the vast majority, (135 vaccine-adverse event pairs), the evidence is inadequate to accept or reject a causal relationship."
“對絕大多數，（135項疫苗—負面事件對），獲得的證據不足于接受或者否定一項因果關系。”
In other words, for the majority of side effects and health conditions that have occurred in conjunction with vaccinations, they simply have no idea whether the vaccine caused the problem or not. In fact, the IOM Committee warned that there should be no misinterpretation of the fact that they DO NOT KNOW whether or not more than 100 very serious reported health problems linked to the eight vaccines they studied are caused by those vaccines. In most cases, the Committee was unable to come to a conclusion because there are no or very few scientific studies investigating the reported vaccine-related adverse event or the studies, which are published in the medical literature, are methodologically flawed in some way.
換句話說，對于與疫苗注射后發生的大部分副作用與健康狀況而言，他們完全不懂疫苗注射是否導致出現了的問題。事實上，藥學研究所的委員會警告，對如下情況不應做誤導性解釋：他們不知道100種所報告的與八種疫苗相關聯的非常嚴重健康問題是由這些疫苗造成的，還是不是由它們造成的。在大部分情況下，該委員會未能夠取得結論的原因，是因為醫學文獻中僅發表了很少對疫苗相關負面事件或研究進行審查的科學研究論文，而且它們采用的方法學在一定程度上有缺陷。
And isn’t this precisely the problem? The current vaccination schedule is a one-size-fits-all approach that has never been proven safe!
這不準確就是問題所在？目前的疫苗安排是“同一劑量滿足所有的人”的方式，但是這種方式從來沒有證實是安全的！
As Barbara Loe Fisher, founder of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), stated:
如芭芭拉·羅·費舍（Barbara Loe Fisher），國家疫苗信息中心（National Vaccine Information Center -- NVIC）創立者強調：
"The truth is, nobody knows how many vaccine victims there are in America, how many of the 1 in 6 learning disabled children; or the 1 in 9 with asthma; or the 1 in 100 who develop autism; or the 1 in 450 who become diabetic, can trace their chronic inflammation, disease and disability back to vaccine reactions that have been dismissed by public health officials and doctors for the past century as just "a coincidence.""
“真相是，沒有任何人知道在美國有多少疫苗受害者：沒有人知道在每6個孩子中為什么有一名有學習障礙（learning disabled）的孩子；或者每9個孩子中為什么有一名有氣喘（asthma）的孩子；或者每100個美國人中為什么有1名患孤獨癥（autism）；或者每450個美國人中為什么有1名患糖尿病（diabetic），他們的慢性抑郁癥（inflammation）、疾病與殘疾能夠回追到疫苗反應，這些疫苗反應過去百年來一直被公共健康官員與醫生們忽略不考慮為僅僅是‘巧合’”。
Or, if they aren’t dismissed as coincidence, they are dismissed on the grounds that there’s not enough data available to establish a “causal relationship.” This is exactly the reason why unbiased vaccine safety studies are so desperately and urgently need.
或者，如果它們沒有作為“巧合”忽略不考慮，它們在沒有建立“因果關系”足夠數據基礎上不予考慮。這就是為什么無偏見的疫苗安全研究如此緊急必要。
NVIC recently issued a statement regarding IOM's new report, noting this very fact:
國家疫苗信息中心（NVIC）最近發表了關于美國政府藥學研究所新的報告的一個聲明，特別關注這一事實：
"The [IOM] Committee was hampered by the same gaps in knowledge regarding vaccine adverse effects that hampered IOM Committees undertaking the same task in 1991 and 1994. For the majority of potential vaccine adverse effects reported to be associated with vaccines, this IOM Committee like those before, came to the conclusion that the biological mechanism and epidemiological evidence published in the medical literature is simply inadequate to accept or reject a causation finding.
“（藥學研究所）委員會這次的審查受到有關疫苗負面影響知識缺口的束縛，與藥學研究所委員會1991年與1994年承擔同樣任務時受到的有關疫苗負面影響知識缺口束縛相同。對于報告中涉及到的與疫苗相關聯的大部分潛在疫苗負面影響，這個藥學研究所委員會像他們以前一樣，得到結論：醫學文獻中發表的鴨血生物學機制與流行病學證據不足以接受或否定一項顯示因果關系的發現。
This is a very important conclusion, because the current state of science holds no answers for parents and doctors, who for many years have reported multiple vaccine injuries to the government's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).
“這是一項重要的結論，因為目前狀態的科學對孩子們的家長與醫生們給不出答案，他們多年來向政府的‘疫苗負面事件報告系統（Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System -- VAERS）’報告了多重疫苗損傷。
Insufficient scientific evidence to make a call about whether certain vaccines do or do not cause a wide range of serious health conditions, such as encephalitis, encephalopathy, stroke, asthma, autism, SIDS, multiple sclerosis, arthritis, lupus, and blood disorders, is problematical when these vaccines are mandated by law to be used by every child and recommended for many adults.
“對與某些疫苗是或者不造成廣泛范圍嚴重健康狀況，例如腦炎（encephalitis）、腦病（encephalopathy）、中風（stroke）、哮喘（asthma）、孤獨癥（autism）、嬰兒猝死綜合癥（SIDS）、多發性硬化癥（multiple sclerosis）、關節炎（arthritis）、狼瘡（lupus）以及血液失調（blood disorders），在法規強制規定對每個孩子以及推薦對許多成年人注射這些疫苗情況下，由于缺乏足夠科學證據而不能發出警告就成了一個大問題。
The Committee's clear acknowledgement that there is a lack of adequate scientific understanding about the way that vaccines act in the human body, including how, when, why and for whom they are harmful, is confirmation that more and higher quality vaccine safety science is urgently needed."
（藥學研究所）委員會清楚承認缺乏關于疫苗在人類體內如何如何作用的足夠科學理解，包括缺乏各種疫苗如何、何時、為什么以及它們對什么樣的人有害的足夠科學理解，這確認目前緊急需要高質量的疫苗安全科學。”
Why Are So Many Children Receiving Extra Vaccines?
為什么這么多的孩子注射額外次數疫苗？
Adding insult to injury, a separate review by independent researchers looking at the 1999-2003 National Immunization Survey data found that nearly 10 percent of children aged 19-35 months have received extra vaccinations and the rate was highest for children who received vaccines at more than one facility or from more than one provider. This is the last thing that kids need, considering that just about every year one or more “new” vaccines are added to the already overloaded schedule.
令疫苗造成的損傷更為糟糕，由獨立研究者們進行的一項單獨的審查對1999-2003年度國家免疫調查（National Immunization Survey）數據進行了研究，發現19-35個月年齡兒童的10%獲得額外次數疫苗注射，而且，對于從一家以上機構或多家提供方獲得疫苗的兒童的額外疫苗次數最高。這是孩子們所需要的最后一件事，特別考慮到每年出現一種或更多種“新”的疫苗出現加入到目前已經過載的安排。
As it stands, children are expected to get 48 doses of 14 vaccines by the time they’re just 6 years old – starting with the first vaccine given on the day of birth in the newborn nursery! By age 18, federal public health officials say they should have gotten a total of 69 doses of 16 vaccines.
從目前情況看，現在的孩子到他們6歲時生長過程中應期望注射14種疫苗總共注射48次 – 從出生第一天在新生兒室注射第一次疫苗開始！到18歲時，聯邦公共健康官員說，他們注射了16種總共69次疫苗。
This “prescription” is the same for every U.S. child, even though it’s well known that all children are not the same biologically – as the recent Institute of Medicine report clearly points out - and some children will not be able to survive the currently recommended vaccine schedule without suffering serious harm to their health. And if you take your child to multiple health care providers or facilities, the odds are high that they may be mistakenly given “extra” vaccines on top of the recommended schedule.
美國每一個孩子獲得相同這樣的“處方”，盡管人們都了解所有的孩子在生物學方面并不相同 – 如同藥學研究所最近的報告清楚指出的那樣 – 某些孩子不能承受目前推薦的疫苗安排因而造成對他們健康嚴重的損傷。如果你帶你的孩子去多家保健服務提供者或機構的話，他們錯誤地“額外”注射他們最為推薦安排的疫苗的幾率較高。
To avoid this, if you do decide to vaccinate, be sure you keep a detailed record of which vaccinations your child has received, and when – do not rely on your doctor’s office to do that for you. It is also a good idea to have your child’s vaccination history on hand in the event there is a vaccine reaction.
為了避免這種情況，如果你決定注射疫苗的話，一定確保你保留這你的孩子過去注射過的所有疫苗的詳細記錄，以及何時注射 – 而不要依賴于你的醫生的辦公室為你這樣做。出現疫苗反應時，隨身攜帶你的孩子的疫苗注射歷史記錄是一個好主意。
You Can View Common Vaccine Reactions Right Now
你現在可以看通常的疫苗反應
The IOM report may feel there is too little evidence to make conclusions about vaccine-induced side effects, but you can make a conclusion for yourself by reading the entire IOM report yourself at:
藥學研究所可能感到做出對某些疫苗導致副作用結論的證據過少，但是你可以通過讀整個報告做出自己的結論：
http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2011/Adverse-Effects-of-Vaccines-Evidence-and-Causality.aspx
You can also review the vaccine adverse event reports made by doctors and patients or parents themselves to the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a national surveillance database to which anyone can post a vaccine reaction report. VAERS was established in 1986 under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which requires health professionals to report serious health problems, including hospitalizations, injuries and deaths, that occur after the administration of routinely recommended vaccines.
你也可以審查醫生與患者或者家長們自己向聯邦“疫苗負面事件報告系統”（Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System -- VAERS）的疫苗負面事件報告。這是任何人可以提交疫苗反應報告的國家監視網。“疫苗負面事件報告系統”1986年依據“國家兒童疫苗損傷法令”（National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act）建立，要求健康專業人士報告嚴重的健康問題，包括注射常規推薦一秒后發生的住院治療、損傷與死亡事件。
An important aspect of VAERS is that anyone can both read and post vaccine adverse events to this database. So if your doctor discounts your concerns about vaccination (or afterward, if your child regresses or gets ill after a vaccine), you can verify or report them yourself -- and people are doing just that when doctors or other vaccine providers refuse to report to VAERS after a vaccine reaction occurs.
“疫苗負面事件報告系統”的一個重要方面是，任何人士都可以閱讀該系統數據庫中的疫苗負面事件報告，也可以向這個系統提交這樣的報告。因此，如果你的醫生不考慮你對疫苗注射提出的擔心（或者不考慮注射疫苗后出現的異常或病癥），你可以訪問該系統閱讀其他的報告進行自己的驗證，或者可以自己提交注射疫苗后出現異常或病癥的報告 – 當醫生或其他疫苗提供方在發生疫苗反應后拒絕報告時，人們就是這樣做。
You can access VAERS here, or you can go to Medalarts.org, which provides an easy, powerful search engine for looking up specific reactions or vaccines in the VAERS database. With over 70 vaccines included, VAERS is an excellent tool that can help you read descriptions of vaccine reactions and identify which vaccines are associated with the most side effects.
你可以直接訪問“疫苗負面事件報告系統”（VAERS），或者訪問http://www.Medalarts.org ，后者提供對VAERS系統數據庫中特定反應或特定疫苗的一個使用方便、強有力的搜索引擎。包括有70多種疫苗的VAERS系統數據庫是一個優良的工具，可以幫助你閱讀疫苗反應的描述，并且識別哪些疫苗與絕大部分副作用相關聯。
It is important to know, though, that only a tiny fraction of serious health problems that occur after vaccination are actually reported. Studies have estimated that less than 10 percent, to as little as ONE percent of vaccine side effects are ever reported to VAERS, so the true side effects are easily FAR higher than the statistics show.
了解下述情況很重要，注射疫苗以后出現的嚴重健康問題中實際上僅有很小數量實際進行報告。研究表明，少到10%，以至更少到1%的疫苗副作用事件最終被報告給VAERS系統，因此真實的副作用比例很容易遠遠高于VAERS系統數據庫表明的統計數字。
Are You Ready to Get Educated About Vaccines?
你準備好獲得關于疫苗的教育沒有？
The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) is clearly the leading Internet resource, providing objective, unbiased information that you will need to make intelligent, informed decisions about which vaccines you, your children or other members of your family may want to use.
國家疫苗信息中心（NVIC）明顯是這方面領先的互聯網信息來源，提供幫助你對你自己、你的孩子以及你家里其他成員可能需要注射哪些疫苗做出聰明的、知情情況下決定的客觀的、非偏見的信息。
If you have further questions about vaccination, make sure you consult a trusted health care professional, who has taken the time to become educated personally about vaccines. And if your doctor threatens or belittles you, refuses to treat your family if you want to use an alternative vaccination schedule, or will not take the time to discuss your vaccine concerns with you and allow you to make informed, voluntary vaccination decisions, I suggest you find one who will. Remember, it is your choice and your responsibility to get educated about vaccination, and your doctor should treat you with respect and work with you on this.
如果你們對于疫苗注射有進一步的問題，一定確保自己向一位值得信任的保健專業人士進行咨詢，他曾花費時間使自己成為關于疫苗的受過教育的人士。而且，如果你的醫生在你們要求使用另外可選擇的疫苗注射安排情況下威脅或輕視你，或者不愿意花費時間與你討論你對于疫苗的擔心是你能夠做出知情情況下自愿接受疫苗注射的決定，我建議你找到另外能夠這樣做的醫生。請記住，是你自己的選擇以及你自己的責任獲得關于疫苗的教育，你的醫生應當在這個問題上尊重你和配合你。
I also encourage you to get involved with the work that NVIC is doing to protect your right to choose which vaccines you want your children to get, including the legal right to use all, some, or no vaccines at all. Register for the free NVIC Advocacy Portal that educates you about threats to your legal right to make vaccine choices and puts you directly in contact with your elected state representatives so you can help protect vaccine exemptions in your state. Stay informed about what is happening in your state and make your voice heard.
我也鼓勵你參與國家疫苗信息中心（NVIC）在從事的工作，他們工作的目的是保護你選擇你愿意你的孩子接受何種疫苗注射的權利，包括接受所有疫苗注射、選擇其中一部分以至全部不選擇的法律權利。你可以免費注冊你的NVIC擁護者入口，它將教育你了解對你的做出疫苗注射選擇的權利可能面臨的威脅，同時安排你與被選舉的你們州的代表直接聯系，以便你可以在你們州幫助保護疫苗免注射權。你應當保持了解你們州與此有關情況的進展，同時讓人們聽到你的聲音。
Go to www.NVICAdvocacy.org and register today to take action.
建議你訪問www.NVICAdvocacy.org并且今天注冊采取行動。
Source: Health Freedoms September 6, 2011：Vaccines Are Dangerous – The Government Says So!
信息來源：《健康自由網站》2011年9月6日文章《疫苗有危險 – 政府這樣說！》
http://healthfreedoms.org/2011/09/06/vaccines-are-dangerous-the-government-says-so/
Source: Institute of Medicine: Adverse Effects of Vaccines: Evidence and Causality August 25, 2011
信息來源：美國政府《藥學研究所網站》2011年8月25日論文《疫苗的負面影響：證據與因果關系》
http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2011/Adverse-Effects-of-Vaccines-Evidence-and-Causality.aspx
信息來源：公共健康報告《作為（缺乏統一系統的—譯注）分裂性保健臨床標志的額外免疫》，發表于：公共健康報告，2011年7月-8月；126增刊2：48-50
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21812169
Source: Green Med Info: Extra-immunization is associated with receiving immunizations from multiple providers and multiple facility types.
信息來源：綠色醫學信息：額外免疫與從多重提供方與多重保健機構接受免疫相關
Related Links:
相關鏈接：
A Parent's Horrid Nightmare: Coming Soon to YOUR State?
一位孩子家長可怕的噩夢：很快也來到你的州？
Should Pediatricians 'Fire' Patients Whose Parents Don't Vaccinate?
小兒科醫生是否有權“開除”不接受疫苗注射的家長的患兒（節錄）
One of the Most Inexcusable Vaccine Revelations of All...
最為不可寬恕的揭露出來的與疫苗有關的事（節錄）：
本文相關系列必須一起研究的文章：
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4bb17e9d0102du25.html
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4bb17e9d0102du24.html
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4bb17e9d0102du21.html
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4bb17e9d0102du20.html
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4bb17e9d0102du1x.html
美國科學家揭示人類自然產生免疫力與疫苗激發免疫力的區別
關鍵詞：疫苗 疫苗注射 疫苗作用 激發免疫力 自然免疫力
存在一種誤解，說你的孩子需要疫苗才能保持健康。沒有任何疾病由于“疫苗缺乏”而造成。事實上，從來不生病的人的秘密之一揭示，他們從來不注射疫苗。加強你的免疫系統成為一個“精干的、有效的、與疾病戰斗的武器”的關鍵，取決于你的生活方式習慣 – 健康食品、消除壓力、鍛煉身體、睡眠、暴露于陽光等等。人為用疫苗人操控你的免疫系統與此不同，也不會產生同樣期望的與疾病戰斗的結果。疫苗導致的免疫力與自然免疫力的一項主要區別，來自你如何暴露于這些生物體。莫科拉博士向民眾深入淺出的解釋，揭示了疫苗生產商以及推動向兒童大范圍強制性注射疫苗的有關部門向絕大部分民眾掩蓋的真相。
自然免疫力與疫苗激發免疫力的區別？
Quoted from: Should Pediatricians 'Fire' Patients Whose Parents Don't Vaccinate?
節錄自：小兒科醫生是否有權“開除”不接受疫苗注射的家長的患兒
翻譯與轉載者：陳一文（[email protected]）
（80年代兩屆全國青聯委員）
《新浪網》“陳一文顧問博客”轉載：http://blog.sina.com.cn/cheniwan
《陳一文顧問網站》：http://sea3000.net/cheniwan
By Dr. Mercola August 18 2011
作者：莫克拉博士 發表日期：2011年8月18日
Vaccines do Not "Make" You Healthy
疫苗并不“使”你健康
There is a misconception, one that is perpetuated by many pediatricians in the United States, that you need vaccines to stay well. No disease is caused by a "vaccine deficiency." In fact, in my recent article featuring the top secrets of people who never get sick, vaccination is nowhere to be found.
存在一種誤解，在美國被許多小兒科醫生企圖使人牢記不忘的誤解，說你需要疫苗才能保持健康。沒有任何疾病由于“疫苗缺乏”而造成。事實上，我最新的文章從來不生病的人的秘密揭示，他們從來不注射疫苗。
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/01/28/the-secrets-of-never-getting-sick.aspx
Why?
為什么？
Because, ultimately, it is the state of your immune system that determines whether or not you get sick when you're exposed to an infectious disease. The keys to boosting your immune system into a "lean, mean, disease-fighting machine" lie in your lifestyle habits -- healthy food, stress relief, exercise, sleep, exposure to sunlight and so on. Artificially manipulating your immune system with a vaccine is not the same thing, nor does it produce the same desired disease-fighting result.
因為，你暴露于某種感染性的疾病后，決定你是否生病的最終因素，是你的免疫系統的狀態。加強你的免疫系統成為一個“精干的、有效的、與疾病戰斗的武器”的關鍵，取決于你的生活方式習慣 – 健康食品、消除壓力、鍛煉身體、睡眠、暴露于陽光等等。人為用疫苗人操控你的免疫系統與此不同，也不會產生同樣期望的與疾病戰斗的結果。
What is the Difference Between Natural and Vaccine-Induced Immunity?
自然免疫力與疫苗激發免疫力的區別？
Many still believe vaccines provide the same kind of immunity as is provided when you naturally heal from an infection, and this widespread misconception needs to be corrected.
很多人依然相信疫苗能夠提供由感染自然痊愈時的同樣免疫力效果，這種廣泛傳播的誤解需要修正。
The presumed result of a vaccination is to help you build immunity to potentially harmful organisms that cause disease. Now, your body's immune system is already designed to do this in response to infectious organisms that you are exposed to naturally. One major difference between vaccine-induced immunity and natural immunity stems from how you're exposed to these organisms.
注射疫苗假定的結果是幫助你對造成疾病的潛在生物體建立免疫力。實際上，你的身體的免疫系統現在就已經設計得能夠對你自然條件下接觸的感染性生物體做出這樣的反應。疫苗導致的免疫力與自然免疫力的一項主要區別，來自你如何暴露于這些生物體。
Most disease-causing organisms enter your body through the mucous membranes of your nose, mouth, lungs or your digestive tract.
大部分導致疾病的生物體通過你的鼻子、嘴、肺或者你的消化管的黏膜（mucous membranes）進入你體內。
These mucous membranes have their own immune system, called the secretory IgA immune system. It is a different system from the one activated when a vaccine is injected into your body. Your IgA immune system is your body's first line of defense and its job is to deal with infectious microorganisms at their exposure points, reducing or even eliminating the need for activation of your body's entire immune system.
這些黏膜具有自己的免疫系統，稱之為分泌IgA免疫系統（secretory IgA immune system）。這個免疫系統與疫苗注射進入你體內時啟動的免疫系統不同。你的IgA免疫系統是你的身體的第一道防線，它的任務是在接觸感染性微生物暴露之處對方它們，減少或以至避免啟動你身體的整個免疫系統的必要性。
However, when a lab-altered infectious microorganism is injected into your body in a vaccine, and especially when combined with an immune adjuvant, such as aluminum, your IgA immune system is bypassed, stimulating your immune system to mount a very strong inflammatory response. Vaccines can also trigger such a strong inflammatory response that the inflammation becomes chronic and leads to chronic illness or disability. (People with a personal or family history of severe allergy or autoimmunity should be cautious about vaccination because they already have a genetic predisposition to inflammatory responses that do not resolve and can lead to chronic health problems.)
然而，當某種實驗室內已經修正了的感染性微生物以疫苗的方式注射進入你體內時，特別當這種疫苗與例如鋁等某種免疫輔佐物結合時，它們越過了你的IgA免疫系統，刺激你身體的整個免疫系統做出非常強烈的發炎性反應。疫苗觸發的這種強烈的發炎性反應可能造成變為慢性的并導致慢性疾病或傷殘。（凡本人或家庭病史有嚴重過敏或自身免疫癥（autoimmunity）的人士應當對疫苗注射幾位謹慎，因為它們對炎癥性反應的遺傳傾向（genetic predisposition）不但不解決問題而且可能導致慢性健康問題。）
Injecting these lab-altered microorganisms into your body to provoke an atypical, temporary immunity is clearly not the same way your body develops a naturally acquired type of immunity. Your immune system simply was not designed to be injected with lab altered disease-causing organisms in this manner. This is one reason why vaccines almost always only provide temporary, not permanent, immunity. Additionally, this plays a large role in why vaccines have the potential to do serious damage to your health.
將這種實驗室內已經修正的微生物注射進入你的身體以期激起某種非典型的、臨時性的免疫力，與你的身體發展某種自然獲得類型的免疫力的方式顯然不同。你的免疫系統根本不是設計來以這種方式注射實驗室內修正過的導致疾病的生物體。這就是疫苗為什么幾乎總是提供臨時性的而非永久性的免疫力的原因之一。此外，這種情況對于疫苗為什么對你的健康造成潛在嚴重損害也扮演重要作用。
Since vaccines bypass your natural first-line defense (your lgA immune system), they are never 100 percent protective because they provide only temporary, typically inferior immunity compared to that your body would acquire by experiencing and healing from the natural disease.
由于疫苗越過了你身體的天然的第一道防線（你的IgA免疫系統），它們永遠不是100%保護性的，因為，與你的身體通過精力和從自然疾病中康復過程中獲得的免疫力相比，疫苗僅能夠提供臨時性的、典型的劣等的免疫力。
疫苗廠商幕后推動兒童廣泛疫苗注射優先關乎健康還是利潤
關鍵詞：疫苗 疫苗注射 疫苗副作用 疫苗機制 疫苗污染 病毒 危害健康
醫藥公司及其醫藥游說者密切涉及推動AB499疫苗通過州法規的活動。在剝奪家長對可能損害他們孩子健康的醫療程序做出知情決定的權利后，醫藥公司可以為他們的Gardasil疫苗開拓新的市場。而且，在沒注射一劑疫苗花費政府108美元（社會醫療保障費用—譯注）情況下，這種疫苗的生產商默克醫藥公司（Merck）可能獲得令人滿意的利潤。所提議的該項法規將花費已經嚴重缺乏財政收入的加利福尼亞數百萬美元進行實施。這些錢的大部分將付給默克（Merck）等疫苗生產公司。在沒有取得他們家長同意情況下如果孩子因接受疫苗注射受到損傷或出現死亡，是否考慮了應當由誰來負責任？無論醫生或者醫藥公司承擔任何法律責任，因此最終還是要孩子的家長承擔孩子的治療費用，如果他們的孩子因疫苗注射受到損傷。疫苗生產商幕后推動兒童廣泛疫苗注射，他們優先關乎兒童的健康，還是利潤？注射疫苗發生損害兒童醫生健康的后果，誰來負責？
Dr. Mercola: AB499 More About Profits than Health
麥克拉博士：疫苗AB499更關乎利潤而非健康
轉載自：
翻譯與轉載者：陳一文（[email protected]）
（80年代兩屆全國青聯委員）
《新浪網》“陳一文顧問博客”轉載：http://blog.sina.com.cn/cheniwan
《陳一文顧問網站》：http://sea3000.net/cheniwan
By Dr. Mercola September 16 2011
作者：莫克拉博士 發表日期：2011年9月16日
Pharmaceutical and medical lobbyists were heavily involved in pushing AB499 through the state legislature. After all, by stripping parents of their right to make informed decisions about medical procedures that could harm their children, they have tapped a new market for their Gardasil vaccine. And, at a cost of $108 per dose to the government, Merck, the vaccine's manufacturer, stands to profit handsomely.
醫藥公司及其醫藥游說者密切涉及推動AB499疫苗通過州法規的活動。在剝奪家長對可能損害他們孩子健康的醫療程序做出知情決定的權利后，醫藥公司可以為他們的Gardasil疫苗開拓新的市場。而且，在沒注射一劑疫苗花費政府108美元（社會醫療保障費用—譯注）情況下，這種疫苗的生產商默克醫藥公司（Merck）可能獲得令人滿意的利潤。
Meanwhile, California taxpayers will likely foot the bill for the multi-millions of dollars this law will cost to implement. Parents are NOT responsible for the costs (how could they be if they're not even informed that a vaccine was given?), so the bulk will come from the government (i.e. the taxpayers).
自此同時，加利福尼亞的納稅人看來還要承擔實施該項法規的提案將要化肥的數百萬美元費用。由于家長們對這些費用不承擔責任（甚至不告訴他們對他們的孩子注射了這種疫苗他們怎么能負責？），因而大部分費用將來自政府（即來自納稅人）。
As Fisher states:
如同Fisher先生指出的那樣：
"This proposed law would cost the cash-strapped state of California multi-millions of dollars to implement. Most of that money will go to Merck and other vaccine corporations to pay for multiple doses of each vaccine that will be aggressively promoted to young children, who are not yet physically, mentally or emotionally mature enough to make fully informed decisions about risk-taking, including whether or not to take a medical risk."
“所提議的該項法規將花費已經嚴重缺乏財政收入的加利福尼亞數百萬美元進行實施。這些錢的大部分將付給默克（Merck）以及其他的疫苗生產公司，以支付激烈推銷給嬰幼兒的多次注射疫苗，而這些孩子無論身體、精神或感情上都沒有成熟到對這種承擔風險的事在充分知情條件下做出無論接受或不接受這種醫療風險的決定。”
Further, has anyone considered who will be held responsible if a child is permanently injured or killed from receiving a vaccination without their parents' consent? Neither physicians nor drug companies have any legal liability, so the parents will ultimately be the ones who will have to carry the financial burden if their child suffers damage from the vaccine.
此外，在沒有取得他們家長同意情況下如果孩子因接受疫苗注射受到損傷或出現死亡，是否考慮了應當由誰來負責任？無論醫生或者醫藥公司承擔任何法律責任，因此最終還是要孩子的家長承擔孩子的治療費用，如果他們的孩子因疫苗注射受到損傷。
美國科學家不久前揭露出來的與疫苗有關最為不可寬恕的事
關鍵詞：疫苗 疫苗副作用 流產胚細胞 麻疹疫苗 MMR疫苗 孤獨癥
美國一家醫藥公司前任科學家海倫·拉塔扎克（Helen Ratajczak）不久前出版她關于孤獨癥研究進行綜合審查的專著披露出來的長期以來向公眾掩蓋的一項令人震驚的事實：目前在23種疫苗生產中使用人類組織流產胚細胞。拉塔扎克認為引入人類DNA用于麻疹--腮腺炎--風疹MMR疫苗及其與孤獨癥增加的對應關系，認為二者之間可能有聯系。進一步信息表明：生物技術公司正在他們研究開發的從湯類食品到皮膚抗衰老霜使用這些流產胎兒細胞系。熱衷于美容化妝品的女士們對此一定也要注意了！
One of the Most Inexcusable Vaccine Revelations of All...
揭露出來的與疫苗有關最為不可寬恕的事（節錄）：
轉載自：
翻譯與轉載者：陳一文（[email protected]）
（80年代兩屆全國青聯委員）
《新浪網》“陳一文顧問博客”轉載：http://blog.sina.com.cn/cheniwan
《陳一文顧問網站》：http://sea3000.net/cheniwan
By Dr. Mercola July 10 2011
作者：（美國）莫科拉博士 發表日期：2011年7月10日
Former drug company scientist Helen Ratajczak recently created a firestorm of debate from all sides of the vaccine-autism issue when she published her comprehensive review of autism research. This is a massively important study, for more than one reason. One element brought to light that has managed to stay well below the radar is the use of aborted embryonic cells in vaccine production.
一家醫藥公司前任科學家海倫·拉塔扎克（Helen Ratajczak）不久前出版她關于孤獨癥（autism）研究進行綜合審查的專著激發了多方面圍繞疫苗—孤獨癥問題的巨大爭論。由于多項理由，海倫的研究是一項重要的研究。該項研究披露出來的長期以來向公眾掩蓋的一項令人震驚的事實：疫苗生產中使用了流產胚細胞（aborted embryonic cells）。
CBS News recently reported:
哥倫比亞廣播公司新聞（CBS News）最近報告：
“Ratajczak reports that about the same time vaccine makers took most thimerosal out of most vaccines (with the exception of flu shots which still widely contain thimerosal), they began making some vaccines using human tissue.
拉塔扎克（Ratajczak）報告了在疫苗生產商從疫苗中取消了大部分硫汞撒（thimerosal）的同時（流行性感冒疫苗是例外，它依然廣泛包含硫汞撒），這些疫苗生產商開始在某些疫苗中使用人類組織（human tissue）。
Ratajczak says human tissue is currently used in 23 vaccines. She discusses the increase in autism incidences corresponding with the introduction of human DNA to MMR vaccine, and suggests the two could be linked.”
拉塔扎克（Ratajczak）說，目前在23種疫苗使用人類組織。她討論了將引入人類DNA用于麻疹--腮腺炎--風疹MMR疫苗（measles-- mumps--rubella – MMR）及其與孤獨癥增加的對應關系，認為二者之間可能有聯系。”
Shocking Examples of Aborted Fetal Cells Used by the Food and Cosmetic Industry
令人震驚的例子：食品行業與美容化妝品行業研發使用流產胎兒細胞的實例
With a little further probing, you'll discover the practice of using aborted fetal cell lines extends far beyond vaccines. Biotech companies are using these cell lines in the research and development of products ranging from soup to anti-aging skin creams.
進行更深入一點的信息探索研究，你們將發現流產胎兒細胞系（aborted fetal cell lines）遠遠超過疫苗生產領域。生物技術公司正在他們研究開發的從湯類食品（soup）到皮膚抗衰老霜（anti-aging skin creams）使用這些流產胎兒細胞系（aborted fetal cell lines）。
陳一文顧問按：熱衷于美容化妝品的女士們對此也要注意了！
美國FDA發現疫苗生產廠疫苗小瓶中有熱縮塑料包裝碎片
關鍵詞： 默克公司 疫苗 疫苗生產 疫苗小瓶 塑料包裝 污染
美國食品與藥物管理署（FDA）2011年4月對默克（Merck）公司最大的疫苗生產廠進行檢查的報告。該報告披露，它們在疫苗小瓶中發現了燒焦了熱縮塑料包裝碎片-- 這不是新的或者孤立的發現。福克斯新聞（Fox News）電視報道，2009年11月以來提交給美國FDA的至少12次報告都涉及了疫苗中發現有熱縮塑料包裝，其中八次來自消費者提交的抱怨。像默克這樣的疫苗生產巨頭將追求本企業利潤最大化置于首位，還是將自己生產的疫苗的使用者世界兒童的健康安全置于首位，是當代全世界疫苗生產企業面臨的最大考驗！
FDA Finds Vaccine Plant Has Burnt Shrink Wrap in Vaccine Vials
美國食品與藥物管理署（FDA）發現疫苗生產廠疫苗小瓶中有熱縮包裝碎片（節錄）
Quoted from: Should Pediatricians 'Fire' Patients Whose Parents Don't Vaccinate?
節錄自：小兒科醫生是否有權“開除”不接受疫苗注射的家長的患兒
翻譯與轉載者：陳一文（[email protected]）
（80年代兩屆全國青聯委員）
《新浪網》“陳一文顧問博客”轉載：http://blog.sina.com.cn/cheniwan
《陳一文顧問網站》：http://sea3000.net/cheniwan
Posted By Dr. Mercola | August 18 2011 |
作者：（美國）莫科拉博士 發表日期：2011年8月18日
FDA Finds Vaccine Plant Has Burnt Shrink Wrap in Vaccine Vials
美國食品與藥物管理署（FDA）發現疫苗生產廠疫苗小瓶中有熱縮包裝碎片（節錄）
Another excellent example of why you have every right to question the vaccines being offered to your children came from a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) inspection report from April 2011 of Merck's biggest vaccine-making plant. The report found bits of charred plastic shrink wrap in vaccine vials -- and this was not a new or isolated occurrence.
為什么你有權對與向你的孩子提供的疫苗提出問題的另外一個非常好的例子，是美國食品與藥物管理署（FDA）2011年4月對默克（Merck）公司最大的疫苗生產廠進行檢查的報告。該報告披露，它們在疫苗小瓶中（in vaccine vials）發現了燒焦了熱縮塑料包裝碎片（bits of charred plastic shrink wrap）-- 這不是新的或者孤立的發現。
According to Fox News, at least 12 reports have been submitted to the FDA from Merck regarding shrink wrap in vaccines since November 2009, and eight of these came from consumer complaints. The April report noted that the shrink wrap was reportedly not removed during a washing process and was then charred during a sterilization process. The agency also noted that health risks from the plastic in vaccines could not be ruled out.
根據福克斯新聞（Fox News）電視報道，2009年11月以來提交給美國食品與藥物管理署（FDA）的至少12次報告都涉及了疫苗中發現有熱縮塑料包裝，其中八次來自消費者提交的抱怨。2011年4月的這份報告中提到，熱縮包裝在清洗過程中沒有清除，然后在消毒過程中燒焦。FDA的報告也提到，不能排除疫苗中的塑料可能造成健康風險。
除此之外還揭露出：疫苗給世界3000萬兒童注射后才發現遭到動物病毒污染
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4bb17e9d0102du1x.html
陳一文顧問按：像默克這樣的疫苗生產巨頭將追求本企業利潤最大化置于首位，還是將自己生產的疫苗的使用者世界兒童的健康安全置于首位，是當代全世界疫苗生產企業面臨的最大考驗！
相關研究信息：
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4bb17e9d01017r5c.html
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4bb17e9d0100qjox.html
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4bb17e9d0100qjov.html
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4bb17e9d0100q3o1.html
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4bb17e9d0102dtzq.html
相關文章
「 支持烏有之鄉！」
烏有之鄉 WYZXWK.COM
您的打賞將用于網站日常運行與維護。
幫助我們辦好網站，宣傳紅色文化！
歡迎掃描下方二維碼，訂閱烏有之鄉網刊微信公眾號
