9月9日Nature上發(fā)了浙江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)自然科學(xué)版一編輯(Yuehong Zhang)的一篇題目嚇人的短信《中國雜志的稿件31%是剽竊的》，文后有三個(gè)評論?，F(xiàn)一并轉(zhuǎn)載如下（PDF見附件）：
Nature | Correspondence | Opinion
Chinese journal finds 31% of submissions plagiarized
Yuehong Zhang[email protected]
Journal name
Nature 467 , 153 (09 September 2010) DOI:doi:10.1038/467153d Date published:，doi:10.1038/467153d
Page:Published online
08 September 2010
Since October 2008, we have detected unoriginal material in a staggering 31% of papers submitted to the Journal of Zhejiang University–Science (692 of 2,233 submissions). The publication, designated as a key academic journal by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, was the first in China to sign up for CrossRef's plagiarism-screening service CrossCheck (Nature 466, 167; 2010).
We are therefore campaigning for authors, researchers and editors to be on the alert for plagiarism and to work against cultural misunderstandings. In ancient China, for example, students were typically encouraged to copy the words of their masters.
To this end, we have given lectures and written three papers (including Y. H. Zhang Learn. Publ. 23, 9–14; 2010) that have been widely publicized in China's media (see http://go.nature.com/dPey7X; in Chinese) and reported in CrossRef's quarterly online news magazine (see http://go.nature.com/icUwvh). Our website displays the CrossCheck logo to remind authors of their responsibilities.
Other Chinese journals are also policing plagiarism, using software launched in 2008 by China's Academic Journals Electronic Publishing House and Tongfang Knowledge Network Technology in Beijing.
Author information
· Author information
· Comments
Affiliations
1. Journal of Zhejiang University–Science, 38 Zheda Road, Hangzhou 310027, China
[email protected]
[email protected]
o Yuehong Zhang
Contributions to Correspondence may be submitted to [email protected]; see http://go.nature.com/cMCHno.
Comments
· Comments
1. 2010-09-08 07:08 AM
Tommy Tong said:
Plagiarism and citing others' work are different things. I believe scholars in ancient China cite rather than plagiarize (see the Analects of Confucius, for example). Plagiarism often has selfish connotations – such as monetary or other rewards, whereas citing others' work gives regards to the original author(s) and can be considered an act of generosity or respect. Plagiarism is a product of the reward-centered modern world.
2. 2010-09-08 08:51 AM
S.P. Li said:
I was surprised to the title, and eager to know the details. However, I thought the author mislead the readers definitely according to the text. I don't think it is acceptable that the author used Chinese journal instead of Journal of Zhejiang University?Science.
3. 2010-09-08 10:31 AM
Z.D. Fisher said:
From this correspondence, we can see that some Chinese editors have realized this problem and made their efforts to struggle with misconduct.
「 支持烏有之鄉(xiāng)！」
烏有之鄉(xiāng) WYZXWK.COM
您的打賞將用于網(wǎng)站日常運(yùn)行與維護(hù)。
幫助我們辦好網(wǎng)站，宣傳紅色文化！
注：配圖來自網(wǎng)絡(luò)無版權(quán)標(biāo)志圖像，侵刪！
聲明：文章僅代表作者個(gè)人觀點(diǎn)，不代表本站觀點(diǎn)——烏有之鄉(xiāng)
責(zé)任編輯：heji
歡迎掃描下方二維碼，訂閱烏有之鄉(xiāng)網(wǎng)刊微信公眾號
